Durkan Fencing Academy - Garfield, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HUANG Ethan F. | V D V V D | V V V V V V | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 2 | WONG Ryan | V V D D V | V V V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 3 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | NOBLE Colin | D V V D D | V V V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 5 | DENG Andrew | D V D V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 6 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | D D V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 7 | MICHELL Bailey | V V D V D | V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 8 | FIELDS Matthew S. | D V D D D | V V V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 9 | HONG Vincent Q. | V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 10 | BIERNACKI Maciej L. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 11 | MARGULIES William | V V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 12 | CHTERENTAL Alex | V V V V V | V D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
| 13 | CHEN Evan P. | V V V V D | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 14 | BARNETT Adam | D V V V D | V V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 15 | KIM Matthew | D D D V V D | V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 16 | SINGH Angadh | D V D D | V V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 17 | SHOMAN Zachary | V V V V V | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 18 | ZENG Noah | V V D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | SHOMAN Noah | V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 20 | MICLAUS Justin | V V D V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 21 | SHANAHAN Adam E. | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 22 | PANDEY Neil | V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 23 | MAKLIN Edward P. | V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 24 | WANG Robert | V V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 25 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V V V D D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 27 | SHI Erick | V V D V D | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 28 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | V V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 29 | HAN Daniel Y. | D D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 30 | FENG Leo | V D V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 31 | CADAMBI Roshan | V D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 32 | DEPEW Spencer | D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 33 | DOLAN Charles R. | V D V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 34 | NG Jeremiah | D D V V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 35 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | D V D V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 36 | RODRIGUEZ Darlin | V D D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 37 | SANDERS Samuel B. | D V V D V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 38 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | D D V V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 39 | OH Triton | V D V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 40 | WANG Nicolas | D D D V V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 41 | POSY Daniel | D V V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 41 | STAMIS Kyle | D D V D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 43 | VOSS Jeffer | D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 44 | PIWOWAR Alex | D V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 45 | TANG Shu Hon | V D D D D V | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 | |
| 46 | EDELMAN Seth A. | D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 47 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | D D D D V | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 48 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 48 | XIA Eric | V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 50 | KOGAN Nikita | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 51 | COPP-SALKO Max (Robert Maxwell) | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 52 | HAQ Kamran R. | D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 53 | YUAN Kevin | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 54 | ZHENG Edward L. | D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 55 | GILPIN Samuel | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.