Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 15% |
2 | CHO Gracie L. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
3 | CASTENEDA Erika | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
3 | YEH Marissa E. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
5 | ALTEN Ayaka | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | |
6 | CHUNG Jaein | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
7 | SHIH Diane | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
8 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
9 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | 7% | 29% | 44% | 21% | |
10 | PANT Anisha | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
11 | LEE Isabelle | 1% | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
12 | FERNANDES Thea | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
13 | SU Alena J. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
14 | PENG Amber L. | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
15 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 31% | 6% | |
16 | LEE Bethanie | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
17 | KIM Katherine | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
18 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
19 | KONG Chin-Yi | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
20 | KONG Olivia | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | |
21 | BHARATHI Maithreyi S. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
22 | CUI Melody J. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
23 | LI Angela | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
24 | YIN Helen | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% | |
25 | SUN Chien-Yu | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
26 | TOM Caitlyn | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - | |
27 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
28 | LUO Sandra J. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
29 | KOROL Dana | 6% | 37% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | |
30 | SUN Ruoxi | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
31 | MITLOFF Allison | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
32 | KOSLOW Amicie | 2% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
33 | UMAP Arna | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
34 | GONG Chloe | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
35 | HSIUNG Samantha | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
36 | LEE Samantha X. | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
38 | PISHARODI smriti | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
39 | JI Raissa | 12% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 1% | - | |
40 | WU Sarah | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
41 | ZHANG Erika Y. | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
42 | GREEN Perri L. | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.