RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | KRASTEV Minna | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 2 | TONG Jessie | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 3 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 21% |
| 3 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 16% |
| 5 | KER Grace | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 5 | GHAYALOD Reya | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 7 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% |
| 8 | HWANG Gabriela M. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 9 | CHO Michelle | 1% | 12% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
| 10 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% |
| 11 | SCHMIDT Isabel | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 4% |
| 12 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 38% | 9% |
| 13 | BARNOVITZ Maya | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 35% | 7% |
| 14 | YAM Danika | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 31% | 7% |
| 15 | LIU Sydney | - | 9% | 37% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
| 16 | SOWERS Lia | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 17 | NGUYEN Siena | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 10% |
| 18 | YANG Lea | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 19 | HUAI Delilah | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 2% |
| 20 | HU Michelle | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% |
| 21 | GOMES Diana C. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 22 | TUNG Renee | 14% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 23 | GRULICH Rayaana | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 24 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | - | 4% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 3% |
| 24 | TAN Adelyn | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 26 | WANG Zidan | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
| 27 | STONE Coral | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 28 | GAUTAM Sahana | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 29 | FENG Alicia G. | 6% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 30 | PANIGRAHI Kingsley | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | HITOMI Nadya | 2% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | GOSAVI Aabolee | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | BROCK Sydney | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | YAO Rainie | 1% | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 35 | SAWANT Asmi | 37% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | LO Chloe | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | WANG Peijia | 22% | 46% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | WANG Jingming | 20% | 45% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 40 | YANG JIAQI KIKI | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 41 | JENSEN Katrina | 97% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 42 | GOURNEAU Sophie L. | 18% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.