RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | WU Mengke | V D V D V | V V V V V V | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
2 | AURAY Phileas | V D V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
3 | GHAYALOD Ansh | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
3 | RAJA Arnav | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
5 | LIM William J. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
6 | HOLZ Daniel | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
7 | KOTOV Leonid | V V V D V D | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
8 | PATIL Aaryan A. | D V D V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
9 | JIANG Anthony | V V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
10 | HJERPE Wade H. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
11 | AVAKIAN Alec | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
12 | ZUBATIY Samuel | V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
13 | XU William | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
14 | QIU Nathan | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
15 | CAISSE Simon B. | V V D V V D | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
16 | HAO Anwen | D V D V D D | V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
17 | BERGER Oliver | V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
18 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | V V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
19 | STONE Esmond A. | V V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
20 | YOUNG Nash | D V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
21 | JINICH Ilan R. | V V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
22 | ANDERSON William | V D V V D | V D | 0.8 | 3 | +2.2 |
23 | TAO Jeffrey | V D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
24 | LIN Daniel | D D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
24 | VO Minh Q. | D V D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
26 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | V D D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
27 | SWORDS Evan F. | V V D V D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
28 | LEITH Jack | D V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
29 | PASTORE LIU Vince | D D D V V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
30 | CHAN Aidan | D D D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
31 | BYON Adrian | D D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
32 | LI Yiwei | D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
33 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | V D V V V V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
34 | BOUKHTIN Maxim | D V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
35 | KROON Lucas | V D V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
36 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | V V V D D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
37 | BYON Julian | V V V D D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
38 | GAO Marcus | D V D V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
39 | LO Konnor | D D D V V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
40 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
41 | JAIN Aniket | D V D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
42 | BONN-ELCHONESS Peter | D D D V D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
43 | LO Andrew T. | V D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
44 | HO Aiden | D D V D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
45 | KANG Evan | D V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
46 | CHEN Lohen | D V D D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
47 | BAUER Hank E. | D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
48 | LEE Noah | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
49 | PATRICO Peter | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
50 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
51 | BRAKEY Ryan | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
52 | MUNGUIA Nathan | D D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
53 | REED Samuel J. | D D D V D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
54 | RADJABLI Maximillian | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
55 | NIETO Titus P. | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
56 | YAN Kevin | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
57 | YU Kevin | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
58 | TUNG Ryan | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.