RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KER Grace | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% | |
2 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 44% | 41% |
3 | HWANG Gabriela M. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
3 | KRASTEV Minna | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
5 | XU Ellen | - | - | 1% | 10% | 45% | 44% | |
6 | VESTEL Mira B. | - | - | - | 5% | 28% | 55% | 11% |
7 | GHAYALOD Reya | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
8 | WANG Zidan | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
9 | FEARNS Zara A. | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 47% | 22% |
10 | LI Victoria J. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 41% | |
11 | BELTRAN REYES Alejandra | - | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 69% |
12 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 51% | 30% | |
13 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 10% | |
14 | TONG Jessie | 1% | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
15 | ENDO Miyuki N. | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 41% | 14% | |
16 | HU Michelle | 1% | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
17 | MENDIOLA RITCHIE Ingrid | - | 1% | 13% | 38% | 37% | 11% | |
18 | YAM Danika | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 8% | - |
19 | NGUYEN Siena | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | - |
20 | WU Lanting | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
21 | HUAI Delilah | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
22 | BARNOVITZ Maya | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
23 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
24 | LIU Sydney | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
25 | YAO Rainie | 11% | 41% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | |
26 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 34% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
27 | FENG Alicia G. | 3% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
28 | TUNG Renee | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
29 | BROCK Sydney | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
30 | HITOMI Nadya | 1% | 11% | 36% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
31 | GRULICH Rayaana | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
32 | YANG Lea | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
33 | HUANG Madeline | 2% | 16% | 45% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
34 | PANIGRAHI Kingsley | 4% | 27% | 44% | 22% | 3% | - | |
35 | WIGGINS Yaanathia | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
36 | GOSAVI Aabolee | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
37 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
38 | CHO Michelle | 5% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
39 | SAWANT Asmi | 49% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
40 | GOURNEAU Sophie L. | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
41 | STONE Coral | 5% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
42 | PANIGRAHI Emersen | 10% | 43% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
43 | WANG Peijia | 36% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
44 | SOWERS Lia | 16% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
45 | YANG JIAQI KIKI | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.