RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KIM Zoe L. | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 2 | NGUYEN Tallulah | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 3 | CHA Eugenie | V V V D V | V V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 3 | LEE Natasha | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 5 | KUKVA Taisiya | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 6 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | V D V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 7 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | V D V D D | V V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 8 | PHUKAN Indra | D V D V D | V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 9 | MUN Brianna K. | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 10 | GUO Luxi | V V V V D V | V D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
| 11 | LEE REGINA | V D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 12 | BUSH Emma | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | WANG Angelina | D V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 14 | LAN Alice S. | D V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 15 | WANG Victoria | D D V V V | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 16 | KIM Jayna | V D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 17 | SHARMA Sanvi | V V V D V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 18 | YAO Yilin | D V V D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 19 | HUANG Lanlan | V D V V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 20 | HAU Olivia | D V D V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 21 | BLANCO Ariia | V V D V D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 22 | XU Katelyn | V D D D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 23 | HSIU Elizabeth | D V V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 24 | OLORVIDA Isabella | V D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 25 | MANDAP Svetlanna | V D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 26 | ENRILE Erica | D V D V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 27 | LIN Ashley | D D V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 28 | LIANG Jingjing | D D D D V | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 29 | CHANG Celine A. | D V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 30 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | D D D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 31 | HASIM Eurietta | D D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 32 | LEE Camilla | D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 33 | LIN Ariel | D V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 34 | GUESNARD Maelig | D D V D V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 35 | POON Desiree | D V D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 36 | OBERDERFER Viktoriia | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 37 | SI Amelia | V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 38 | MITRANI Gabriela | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.