RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | 4% | 23% | 48% | 25% | |
2 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
3 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 56% |
3 | CHO Cameron S. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 30% | |
5 | KIM Katherine | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
6 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
7 | DUAN Konnie | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 41% | 13% | |
8 | LEE Ji Ahn | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
9 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
10 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | |
11 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | - | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 10% |
12 | CHO Gracie L. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 42% | 12% |
13 | HAN Crystal | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
14 | LEE Allison | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
15 | FUNG Emma | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 2% |
16 | DO Leila | 8% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
17 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
18 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
19 | SUN Emily | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
20 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 38% | |
21 | GUAN Sydney | 23% | 49% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
22 | KANG Jiyoon | - | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
23 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 4% |
24 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
25 | HOBSON Ava | - | 16% | 43% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
26 | SHUM Elizabeth | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
27 | KIM Rachel | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 14% | 2% | |
28 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | 6% | 32% | 44% | 18% | |
29 | CHO Taylor S. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% | |
30 | SUH Kailey E. | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
31 | SHUM Maya | 4% | 34% | 40% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
32 | HAN Ashley | 4% | 27% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | |
33 | WANG Brina | 2% | 44% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
34 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
35 | MORALES Paulina | 43% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
36 | YANICELLI Sloane | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
37 | GUAN Sophie | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
38 | LUH Mia P. | 1% | 17% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
39 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
40 | CABALU Alaina | 5% | 44% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
41 | WELBORN Calissa | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
42 | KO Claire | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
43 | YAN Noelle | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
44 | MCKAY Teresa | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
45 | CZAPLA Dominika | 92% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
46 | MORENO Francesca | 80% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.