Fairfax Challenge ROC(DV1A, DV2, VET), RJCC, RYC & PARA

Cadet Women’s Saber (CDTWS)

Sunday, May 11, 2025 at 12:00 PM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2271 2386 - 2037
5 - 8 1953 2010 - 1920
9 - 16 1668 1895 - 1335
17 - 26 1123 1387 - 882

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Davidova, Kira Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2386 2098.86
2 Bush, Bethany Tim Morehouse Fencing Club B24 2336 2090.01
3 Fan, Alexandria Miracle Fencing Club B25 2324 2064.74
4 Chang, Norah Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2037 1767.34
5 Heath, Isabella DC Fencers Club D25 2010 1725.15
6 Huang, Neila Forge Fencing Teams DUR D23 1954 1691.27
7 Sevastopulo, Sahra Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 1928 1618.49
8 Rostholder, Hannah Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1920 1609.14
9 Ko, Ariel Globus Fencing Academy U 1842 1570.61
10 McAfee, Jada Nova Fencing Club D25 1877 1539.27
11 Tissone, Veronica Miami Fencing Club E24 1895 1522.37
12 Vats, Ishita New Jersey Fencing Alliance E25 1739 1461.20
13 Yadav, Tishya Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1741 1446.94
14 Fleeger, Sophia Miracle Fencing Club D24 1479 1176.32
15 Topalov, Julia Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1438 1063.06
16 Wilfret, Katerina Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1335 1006.02
17 Fang, Darcy Miracle Fencing Club D25 1387 921.35
18 Wang, Selina Capital Fencing Academy U 1363 919.70
19 Guo, Yuexi Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1252 686.67
20 Fang, Elena Miracle Fencing Club U 1109 524.20
21 Cullom, Brooke Capital Fencing Academy U 1332 518.64
22 Nakata, Gwyneth Capital Fencing Academy U 984 510.05
23 Phillippy, Hannah Capital Fencing Academy U 1080 431.57
24 Lozier, Camryn Triple Threat Fencing Academy U 882 252.19
25 Chan, Isla Delaware Valley Fencers Club-PA U 883 84.41
26 Vannier, Anouk Capital Fencing Academy U 956 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!