Fairfax Challenge ROC(DV1A, DV2, VET), RJCC, RYC & PARA

Cadet Women’s Saber (CDTWS)

Sunday, May 11, 2025 at 12:00 PM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2284 2383 - 2067
5 - 8 1954 2016 - 1882
9 - 16 1728 1910 - 1460
17 - 26 1118 1387 - 839

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Bush, Bethany Tim Morehouse Fencing Club B24 2383 2135.23
2 Davidova, Kira Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2363 2080.95
3 Fan, Alexandria Miracle Fencing Club B25 2322 2063.49
4 Chang, Norah Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2067 1799.98
5 Heath, Isabella DC Fencers Club D25 2016 1743.28
6 Huang, Neila Forge Fencing Teams DUR D23 1938 1678.18
7 McAfee, Jada Nova Fencing Club D25 1979 1658.21
8 Ko, Ariel Globus Fencing Academy U 1882 1621.68
9 Sevastopulo, Sahra Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 1910 1602.82
10 Rostholder, Hannah Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1863 1572.28
11 Yadav, Tishya Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1825 1555.27
12 Vats, Ishita New Jersey Fencing Alliance E25 1818 1551.93
13 Tissone, Veronica Miami Fencing Club E24 1885 1543.43
14 Fleeger, Sophia Miracle Fencing Club D24 1508 1209.28
15 Guo, Yuexi Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1552 1150.00
16 Topalov, Julia Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1460 1131.70
17 Wilfret, Katerina Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1300 980.64
18 Fang, Darcy Miracle Fencing Club D25 1387 921.35
19 Wang, Selina Capital Fencing Academy U 1363 919.70
20 Nakata, Gwyneth Capital Fencing Academy U 1016 576.72
21 Fang, Elena Miracle Fencing Club U 1109 524.20
22 Cullom, Brooke Capital Fencing Academy U 1332 518.64
23 Phillippy, Hannah Capital Fencing Academy U 1052 423.61
24 Lozier, Camryn Triple Threat Fencing Academy U 839 235.59
25 Chan, Isla Delaware Valley Fencers Club-PA U 883 84.41
26 Vannier, Anouk Capital Fencing Academy U 895 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!