Fairfax Challenge ROC(DV1A, DV2, VET), RJCC, RYC & PARA

Cadet Women’s Saber (CDTWS)

Sunday, May 11, 2025 at 12:00 PM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2259 2386 - 2030
5 - 8 1957 2008 - 1913
9 - 16 1665 1877 - 1335
17 - 26 1112 1387 - 882

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Davidova, Kira Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2386 2098.86
2 Bush, Bethany Tim Morehouse Fencing Club B24 2313 2066.54
3 Fan, Alexandria Miracle Fencing Club B25 2308 2048.36
4 Chang, Norah Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2030 1759.70
5 Heath, Isabella DC Fencers Club D25 2008 1722.90
6 Huang, Neila Forge Fencing Teams DUR D23 1979 1714.87
7 Sevastopulo, Sahra Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 1928 1618.44
8 Rostholder, Hannah Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1913 1601.36
9 Ko, Ariel Globus Fencing Academy U 1842 1570.54
10 McAfee, Jada Nova Fencing Club D25 1877 1539.26
11 Tissone, Veronica Miami Fencing Club E24 1860 1469.00
12 Vats, Ishita New Jersey Fencing Alliance E25 1739 1461.09
13 Yadav, Tishya Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1752 1456.38
14 Fleeger, Sophia Miracle Fencing Club D24 1479 1176.24
15 Topalov, Julia Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1438 1063.03
16 Wilfret, Katerina Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1335 1006.02
17 Fang, Darcy Miracle Fencing Club D25 1387 921.30
18 Wang, Selina Capital Fencing Academy U 1363 919.70
19 Fang, Elena Miracle Fencing Club U 1109 524.08
20 Cullom, Brooke Capital Fencing Academy U 1332 518.63
21 Nakata, Gwyneth Capital Fencing Academy U 984 510.04
22 Guo, Yuexi Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1132 436.46
23 Phillippy, Hannah Capital Fencing Academy U 1087 432.42
24 Lozier, Camryn Triple Threat Fencing Academy U 882 252.19
25 Chan, Isla Delaware Valley Fencers Club-PA U 883 84.40
26 Vannier, Anouk Capital Fencing Academy U 956 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!