Chaminade High School - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TRAN Ava D. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 42% | 47% | |
| 2 | DUAN Konnie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
| 3 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 3 | CHOI Kailyn | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 5 | LEE Allison | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 6 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 7 | DANIELYANTS Gabriela | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 8 | BRAR Katrina | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 5% | |
| 9 | LEE Brielle | 26% | 46% | 23% | 4% | < 1% | - | |
| 10 | HOROWITZ Chana | - | 7% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 2% | |
| 11 | BEN-SHUSHAN Teri | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 12 | WOJCIESZYN Sophie | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 13 | KIM Lydia | 2% | 15% | 39% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 14 | RIOS Catherine | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
| 15 | REECE Helen | 5% | 32% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 16 | DURR Strahlia Devi | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 17 | IACCINO Lauren | - | < 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% | |
| 18 | FREEMAN Vivienne | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 19 | FAUSTINA Ava | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.