Fairfax Challenge ROC(DV1A, DV2, VET), RJCC, RYC & PARA

Division IA Men’s Saber (D1AMS)

Friday, May 9, 2025 at 12:30 PM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2935 3313 - 2666
5 - 8 2554 2906 - 2337
9 - 16 2353 2744 - 1920
17 - 25 1659 1947 - 1268

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kallio, Jeffrey Forge Fencing Teams DUR A25 3313 2933.83
2 Al-Nasser, Mahmoud C25 2953 2533.26
3 Aery Fallick, Ozzie Capital Fencing Academy C24 2666 2373.33
4 Arias, Cesar A Nova Fencing Club B25 2807 2219.45
5 Gualtero, Samuel Nova Fencing Club E23 2906 2216.61
6 Robles, Julio Capital Fencing Academy B24 2554 2174.18
7 Fort, David Fencing Club At NC State B25 2421 2097.59
8 Posy, Daniel Manhattan Fencing Center C23 2337 2079.98
9 Beaty, Chad Forge Fencing Teams DUR C24 2584 2061.91
10 Chang, William Capital Fencing Academy C24 2526 2055.98
11 Filatov, Aleksandr Nazlymov Fencing Foundation D25 2744 2020.02
12 Bridgeman, Andrew Capital Fencing Academy C24 2400 2013.26
13 Cheng, Brandon Scarsdale Fencing Center C24 2206 1937.28
14 Ko, Zuriel Globus Fencing Academy C24 2101 1840.60
15 Szulim, Rad Capital Fencing Academy E25 2345 1720.14
16 Rehm, Liam Nazlymov Fencing Foundation E24 1920 1617.02
17 Klebs, Robert Royal Fencing Academy D25 1947 1567.61
18 Benson, Jacob Nova Fencing Club D25 1883 1542.41
19 Toscano, Sebastian Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1806 1462.23
20 Mills, Matthew Capital Fencing Academy E23 1770 1234.05
21 Cunliffe, Sebastian Delaware Valley Fencers Club-PA E25 1767 1192.95
22 Poddar, Shameek International Fencing Club E23 1456 1113.89
23 Howerton, Beckett Miracle Fencing Club U 1524 1048.45
24 Simmons, Evan Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1268 744.28
25 Lane, Jonah Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1507 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!