Fairfax Challenge ROC(DV1A, DV2, VET), RJCC, RYC & PARA

Division IA Men’s Saber (D1AMS)

Friday, May 9, 2025 at 12:30 PM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2934 3333 - 2666
5 - 8 2636 2884 - 2343
9 - 16 2269 2744 - 1874
17 - 25 1606 1953 - 1065

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kallio, Jeffrey Forge Fencing Teams DUR A25 3333 2947.17
2 Al-Nasser, Mahmoud C25 3069 2600.49
3 Aery Fallick, Ozzie Capital Fencing Academy C24 2668 2372.42
4 Robles, Julio Capital Fencing Academy B24 2666 2270.00
5 Arias, Cesar A Nova Fencing Club B25 2884 2262.15
6 Fort, David Fencing Club At NC State B25 2437 2108.45
7 Gualtero, Samuel Nova Fencing Club E23 2882 2088.76
8 Posy, Daniel Manhattan Fencing Center C23 2343 2086.11
9 Chang, William Capital Fencing Academy C24 2529 2038.22
10 Filatov, Aleksandr Nazlymov Fencing Foundation D25 2744 2020.02
11 Bridgeman, Andrew Capital Fencing Academy C24 2346 1931.14
12 Cheng, Brandon Scarsdale Fencing Center C24 2179 1903.08
13 Ko, Zuriel Globus Fencing Academy C24 2057 1793.42
14 Beaty, Chad Forge Fencing Teams DUR C24 2506 1792.80
15 Benson, Jacob Nova Fencing Club D25 1916 1564.94
16 Rehm, Liam Nazlymov Fencing Foundation E24 1874 1557.71
17 Klebs, Robert Royal Fencing Academy D25 1951 1557.04
18 Cunliffe, Sebastian Delaware Valley Fencers Club-PA E25 1801 1212.94
19 Poddar, Shameek International Fencing Club E23 1500 1150.46
20 Toscano, Sebastian Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1624 1073.16
21 Szulim, Rad Capital Fencing Academy E25 1953 951.36
22 Mills, Matthew Capital Fencing Academy E23 1559 893.34
23 Howerton, Beckett Miracle Fencing Club U 1405 817.75
24 Simmons, Evan Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1065 468.49
25 Lane, Jonah Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1599 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!