Fairfax Challenge ROC(DV1A, DV2, VET), RJCC, RYC & PARA

Division IA Men’s Saber (D1AMS)

Friday, May 9, 2025 at 12:30 PM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2967 3313 - 2679
5 - 8 2556 2882 - 2337
9 - 16 2288 2744 - 1874
17 - 25 1614 1943 - 1298

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kallio, Jeffrey Forge Fencing Teams DUR A25 3313 2933.83
2 Al-Nasser, Mahmoud C25 3069 2600.48
3 Aery Fallick, Ozzie Capital Fencing Academy C24 2679 2383.99
4 Arias, Cesar A Nova Fencing Club B25 2807 2219.45
5 Robles, Julio Capital Fencing Academy B24 2566 2183.32
6 Fort, David Fencing Club At NC State B25 2437 2108.45
7 Gualtero, Samuel Nova Fencing Club E23 2882 2088.82
8 Posy, Daniel Manhattan Fencing Center C23 2337 2079.98
9 Beaty, Chad Forge Fencing Teams DUR C24 2584 2061.95
10 Chang, William Capital Fencing Academy C24 2526 2055.99
11 Filatov, Aleksandr Nazlymov Fencing Foundation D25 2744 2020.02
12 Bridgeman, Andrew Capital Fencing Academy C24 2400 2013.26
13 Cheng, Brandon Scarsdale Fencing Center C24 2182 1908.14
14 Ko, Zuriel Globus Fencing Academy C24 2044 1779.99
15 Klebs, Robert Royal Fencing Academy D25 1947 1567.58
16 Rehm, Liam Nazlymov Fencing Foundation E24 1874 1557.71
17 Benson, Jacob Nova Fencing Club D25 1883 1542.41
18 Cunliffe, Sebastian Delaware Valley Fencers Club-PA E25 1767 1192.95
19 Toscano, Sebastian Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1677 1168.13
20 Poddar, Shameek International Fencing Club E23 1475 1130.71
21 Szulim, Rad Capital Fencing Academy E25 1943 1036.75
22 Mills, Matthew Capital Fencing Academy E23 1568 941.73
23 Howerton, Beckett Miracle Fencing Club U 1405 817.75
24 Simmons, Evan Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1298 762.51
25 Lane, Jonah Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1507 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!