Fairfax Challenge ROC(DV1A, DV2, VET), RJCC, RYC & PARA

Division IA Men’s Saber (D1AMS)

Friday, May 9, 2025 at 12:30 PM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2927 3313 - 2556
5 - 8 2566 2741 - 2421
9 - 16 2300 2584 - 1904
17 - 25 1650 1937 - 1258

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kallio, Jeffrey Forge Fencing Teams DUR A25 3313 2933.83
2 Al-Nasser, Mahmoud C25 2953 2533.26
3 Filatov, Aleksandr Nazlymov Fencing Foundation D25 2887 2333.82
4 Aery Fallick, Ozzie Capital Fencing Academy C24 2556 2272.53
5 Arias, Cesar A Nova Fencing Club B25 2654 2163.92
6 Gualtero, Samuel Nova Fencing Club E23 2741 2145.49
7 Robles, Julio Capital Fencing Academy B24 2446 2112.51
8 Fort, David Fencing Club At NC State B25 2421 2097.59
9 Bridgeman, Andrew Capital Fencing Academy C24 2439 2081.30
10 Posy, Daniel Manhattan Fencing Center C23 2337 2079.98
11 Beaty, Chad Forge Fencing Teams DUR C24 2584 2061.91
12 Chang, William Capital Fencing Academy C24 2526 2055.98
13 Cheng, Brandon Scarsdale Fencing Center C24 2251 1987.03
14 Ko, Zuriel Globus Fencing Academy C24 2101 1840.60
15 Szulim, Rad Capital Fencing Academy E25 2261 1792.84
16 Rehm, Liam Nazlymov Fencing Foundation E24 1904 1604.56
17 Benson, Jacob Nova Fencing Club D25 1915 1590.09
18 Klebs, Robert Royal Fencing Academy D25 1937 1572.16
19 Toscano, Sebastian Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1774 1454.08
20 Mills, Matthew Capital Fencing Academy E23 1740 1259.55
21 Cunliffe, Sebastian Delaware Valley Fencers Club-PA E25 1767 1192.95
22 Howerton, Beckett Miracle Fencing Club U 1535 1119.89
23 Poddar, Shameek International Fencing Club E23 1417 1079.73
24 Simmons, Evan Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1258 771.68
25 Lane, Jonah Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1507 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!