Fairfax Challenge ROC(DV1A, DV2, VET), RJCC, RYC & PARA

Division IA Men’s Saber (D1AMS)

Friday, May 9, 2025 at 12:30 PM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2924 3471 - 2600
5 - 8 2483 2771 - 2187
9 - 16 2023 2478 - 1494
17 - 23 1558 1982 - 1128

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kallio, Jeffrey Forge Fencing Teams DUR A25 3471 3071.78
2 Aery Fallick, Ozzie Capital Fencing Academy C24 2698 2399.85
3 Arias, Cesar A Nova Fencing Club B25 2927 2269.03
4 Robles, Julio Capital Fencing Academy B24 2600 2184.98
5 Fort, David Fencing Club At NC State B25 2444 2114.56
6 Chang, William Capital Fencing Academy C24 2529 2038.22
7 Filatov, Aleksandr Nazlymov Fencing Foundation D25 2771 2003.58
8 Cheng, Brandon Allegro Fencing Center C24 2187 1906.89
9 Vedre, Neil Sabio Fencing Academy D25 2095 1828.46
10 Ko, Zuriel Globus Fencing Academy C24 2030 1763.45
11 Klebs, Robert Royal Fencing Academy D25 1975 1563.85
12 Rehm, Liam Nazlymov Fencing Foundation E24 1875 1547.26
13 Benson, Jacob Nova Fencing Club D25 1913 1544.90
14 Beaty, Chad Forge Fencing Teams DUR C24 2323 1262.47
15 Gualtero, Samuel Nova Fencing Club E23 2478 1198.48
16 Poddar, Shameek International Fencing Club E23 1494 1140.90
17 Toscano, Sebastian Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1696 1090.35
18 Howerton, Beckett Miracle Fencing Club U 1447 836.09
19 Cunliffe, Sebastian Delaware Valley Fencers Club-PA U 1462 716.05
20 Mills, Matthew Capital Fencing Academy E23 1450 685.62
21 Simmons, Evan Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1128 491.20
22 Szulim, Rad Capital Fencing Academy E25 1738 155.69
23 Lane, Jonah Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1982 67.64

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!