Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | - | - | 4% | 24% | 48% | 23% | |
| 2 | RIZKALA Joanna | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 3 | SHAY-TANNAS Zoe | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 17% |
| 3 | EDGINGTON Grace | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 5 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 42% |
| 6 | JIN Olivia P. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 7 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 8 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
| 9 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 10 | GIRARDI Aemilia | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 11 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 12 | SHIH Christina | - | 6% | 31% | 43% | 17% | 2% | |
| 13 | CHIANG Emily | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | GRAFF Sophie | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 15 | ZOLA Candace J. | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | YUAN Greta | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 17 | REN Xinling | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 18 | MEDVEDEVA Alexandra | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 19 | PATNAIK Nastassia | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 20 | LIN Angela | - | - | 2% | 14% | 45% | 39% | |
| 21 | FAY Zoe A. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
| 22 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 23 | WANG Jianning | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | SIMONIAN Olivia A. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 25 | NG Sarah W. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | CHU Catherine G. | - | 15% | 44% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | YAN Ava | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | HAMMARBERG Shaine Trea | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | LIEBESKIND Kayla | 4% | 43% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | SWIFT Olana | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 32 | NAYAK Anika | 12% | 41% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | HORAN Alexa | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | SHAFFER Eva | 8% | 39% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | CRUZ Sonia | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 37 | FIDLER Sara | 25% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 38 | GORDON Sharon | 1% | 8% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 39 | BHOGAL Sukhleen | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | FAUSTINO Emily | 52% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | ZIMMERMAN Saskia | 1% | 14% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 42 | O'HARA Eimile J. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 43 | BURNHAM Elizabeth (Liz) A. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 44 | GORTI Ramya | 55% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 45 | OBLONSKY Natalia | < 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 46 | HORMEL Molly | 86% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 47 | MARSH Lisa | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.