Fairfax Challenge ROC(DV1A, DV2, VET), RJCC, RYC & PARA

Veteran Men’s Foil (VETMF)

Friday, May 9, 2025 at 2:30 PM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2609 2984 - 2233
5 - 8 1921 2209 - 1626
9 - 16 1520 1949 - 1202
17 - 23 1411 2036 - 1019

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Diaz, Julio Invictus Fencing A22 2984 2588.74
2 Pashby, Stephen Forge Fencing Teams DUR B23 2484 2043.69
3 Nicholson, Michael Forge Fencing Teams DUR C21 2734 1964.79
4 Derby, Joshua Rockville Fencing Academy E24 2233 1588.93
5 de Barros Conti, Thibaut Fencing Institute Of Texas E25 2066 1580.38
6 Chan, Geoffrey Delaware Valley Fencers Club-PA D24 2209 1407.37
7 Mahnken, Thomas Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. E24 1626 1313.88
8 Karnavas, William Forge Fencing Teams DUR E23 1783 1163.42
9 Guerrero, Gonzalo Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. D24 1780 1014.84
10 Lee, Hans OnTarget Fencing Club E25 1396 941.62
11 Rountree, Andrew Richmond Fencing Club U 1389 917.75
12 Tolentino Sr., Francis Richmond Fencing Club U 1559 902.64
13 Bergen, Kevin Fencing Academy Of Philadelphia - University City U 1949 817.63
14 Chao, Pierre Rockville Fencing Academy U 1202 678.20
15 Bazzle, Christopher Charlotte Fencing Academy U 1533 659.89
16 Wu, Geoffrey OnTarget Fencing Club U 1351 538.41
17 Danton, Gary Masters Fencing Club U 1366 481.13
18 Rogers, Windell Nova Fencing Club U 1233 332.69
19 Crowe, Nathan Rockville Fencing Academy U 1244 324.01
20 Zaidi, Sohail OnTarget Fencing Club U 1019 233.02
21 Chandlee, Richard (Rick) Calvert-Arundel Fencers U 2036 69.35
22 Chandlee, Thomas Rockville Fencing Academy U 1115 41.86
23 Buchanan, Jonah Rockville Fencing Academy U 1867 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!