Fairfax Challenge ROC(DV1A, DV2, VET), RJCC, RYC & PARA

Junior Women’s Saber (JNRWS)

Saturday, May 10, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2343 2358 - 2319
5 - 8 2163 2252 - 2011
9 - 16 1912 2006 - 1792
17 - 25 1242 1689 - 777

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Bush, Bethany Tim Morehouse Fencing Club B24 2350 2101.04
2 Fan, Alexandria Miracle Fencing Club B25 2358 2100.30
3 Davidova, Kira Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2346 2069.65
4 Xu, Emily Miracle Fencing Club C23 2319 2063.62
5 Chang, Norah Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2252 1995.07
6 Merchant, Aishwarya Lion Fencing Academy C24 2214 1963.88
7 Barroso, Isabela Nova Fencing Club B24 2176 1917.25
8 Yadav, Tishya Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 2011 1755.08
9 Colby, Mercer Nova Fencing Club D24 2006 1732.29
10 Huang, Neila Forge Fencing Teams DUR D23 1942 1686.03
11 McAfee, Jada Nova Fencing Club D25 1989 1681.92
12 Ko, Ariel Globus Fencing Academy U 1884 1624.67
13 Sevastopulo, Sahra Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 1914 1619.79
14 Tissone, Veronica Miami Fencing Club E24 1907 1579.07
15 Vats, Ishita New Jersey Fencing Alliance E25 1792 1533.94
16 Butman, Chloe Alexandra Scarsdale Fencing Center E25 1858 1531.29
17 Ming, Emma Forge Fencing Teams DUR E24 1689 1373.35
18 Fleeger, Sophia Miracle Fencing Club D24 1522 1228.53
19 Barboriak, Emily Nova Fencing Club U 1492 1049.01
20 Wilfret, Katerina Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1314 1006.78
21 Fang, Darcy Miracle Fencing Club D25 1325 883.02
22 Fang, Elena Miracle Fencing Club U 1128 609.95
23 Alshaarawi, Sofia Oregon Fencing Alliance U 1063 483.36
24 Lozier, Camryn Triple Threat Fencing Academy U 865 340.55
25 Vannier, Anouk Capital Fencing Academy U 777 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!