Fairfax Challenge ROC(DV1A, DV2, VET), RJCC, RYC & PARA

Junior Women’s Saber (JNRWS)

Saturday, May 10, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2347 2383 - 2319
5 - 8 2114 2208 - 2006
9 - 16 1890 1979 - 1818
17 - 25 1251 1701 - 839

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Bush, Bethany Tim Morehouse Fencing Club B24 2383 2135.23
2 Davidova, Kira Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2363 2080.95
3 Xu, Emily Miracle Fencing Club C23 2319 2063.62
4 Fan, Alexandria Miracle Fencing Club B25 2322 2063.49
5 Merchant, Aishwarya Lion Fencing Academy C24 2208 1959.13
6 Barroso, Isabela Nova Fencing Club B24 2174 1913.34
7 Chang, Norah Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2067 1799.98
8 Colby, Mercer Nova Fencing Club D24 2006 1732.30
9 Huang, Neila Forge Fencing Teams DUR D23 1938 1678.18
10 McAfee, Jada Nova Fencing Club D25 1979 1658.21
11 Ko, Ariel Globus Fencing Academy U 1882 1621.68
12 Sevastopulo, Sahra Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 1910 1602.82
13 Yadav, Tishya Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1825 1555.27
14 Vats, Ishita New Jersey Fencing Alliance E25 1818 1551.93
15 Butman, Chloe Alexandra Scarsdale Fencing Center E25 1879 1549.42
16 Tissone, Veronica Miami Fencing Club E24 1885 1543.43
17 Ming, Emma Forge Fencing Teams DUR E24 1701 1368.24
18 Fleeger, Sophia Miracle Fencing Club D24 1508 1209.28
19 Barboriak, Emily Nova Fencing Club U 1492 1049.01
20 Wilfret, Katerina Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1300 980.64
21 Fang, Darcy Miracle Fencing Club D25 1387 921.35
22 Fang, Elena Miracle Fencing Club U 1109 524.20
23 Alshaarawi, Sofia Oregon Fencing Alliance U 1032 400.92
24 Lozier, Camryn Triple Threat Fencing Academy U 839 235.59
25 Vannier, Anouk Capital Fencing Academy U 895 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!