Fairfax Challenge ROC(DV1A, DV2, VET), RJCC, RYC & PARA

Junior Women’s Saber (JNRWS)

Saturday, May 10, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2342 2364 - 2319
5 - 8 2104 2210 - 2006
9 - 16 1858 1925 - 1742
17 - 25 1269 1703 - 882

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Bush, Bethany Tim Morehouse Fencing Club B24 2364 2117.08
2 Davidova, Kira Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2363 2080.95
3 Xu, Emily Miracle Fencing Club C23 2319 2063.62
4 Fan, Alexandria Miracle Fencing Club B25 2322 2063.49
5 Merchant, Aishwarya Lion Fencing Academy C24 2210 1960.81
6 Barroso, Isabela Nova Fencing Club B24 2149 1886.49
7 Chang, Norah Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2053 1784.64
8 Colby, Mercer Nova Fencing Club D24 2006 1732.30
9 Huang, Neila Forge Fencing Teams DUR D23 1925 1663.29
10 Sevastopulo, Sahra Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 1918 1609.70
11 McAfee, Jada Nova Fencing Club D25 1905 1574.45
12 Ko, Ariel Globus Fencing Academy U 1824 1553.49
13 Tissone, Veronica Miami Fencing Club E24 1892 1539.63
14 Yadav, Tishya Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1804 1524.12
15 Butman, Chloe Alexandra Scarsdale Fencing Center E25 1852 1505.19
16 Vats, Ishita New Jersey Fencing Alliance E25 1742 1468.18
17 Ming, Emma Forge Fencing Teams DUR E24 1703 1356.38
18 Fleeger, Sophia Miracle Fencing Club D24 1508 1209.28
19 Barboriak, Emily Nova Fencing Club U 1492 1049.01
20 Wilfret, Katerina Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1329 1000.30
21 Fang, Darcy Miracle Fencing Club D25 1387 921.35
22 Fang, Elena Miracle Fencing Club U 1109 524.20
23 Alshaarawi, Sofia Oregon Fencing Alliance U 1055 406.70
24 Lozier, Camryn Triple Threat Fencing Academy U 882 252.19
25 Vannier, Anouk Capital Fencing Academy U 956 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!