Fairfax Challenge ROC(DV1A, DV2, VET), RJCC, RYC & PARA

Junior Women’s Saber (JNRWS)

Saturday, May 10, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2336 2386 - 2308
5 - 8 2084 2212 - 1979
9 - 16 1846 1938 - 1739
17 - 25 1272 1693 - 882

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Davidova, Kira Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2386 2098.86
2 Xu, Emily Miracle Fencing Club C23 2335 2078.40
3 Bush, Bethany Tim Morehouse Fencing Club B24 2313 2066.54
4 Fan, Alexandria Miracle Fencing Club B25 2308 2048.36
5 Merchant, Aishwarya Lion Fencing Academy C24 2212 1960.93
6 Barroso, Isabela Nova Fencing Club B24 2113 1847.30
7 Chang, Norah Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2030 1759.70
8 Huang, Neila Forge Fencing Teams DUR D23 1979 1714.87
9 Colby, Mercer Nova Fencing Club D24 1938 1657.55
10 Sevastopulo, Sahra Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 1928 1618.44
11 Ko, Ariel Globus Fencing Academy U 1842 1570.54
12 McAfee, Jada Nova Fencing Club D25 1877 1539.26
13 Tissone, Veronica Miami Fencing Club E24 1860 1469.00
14 Butman, Chloe Alexandra Scarsdale Fencing Center E25 1835 1467.72
15 Vats, Ishita New Jersey Fencing Alliance E25 1739 1461.09
16 Yadav, Tishya Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1752 1456.38
17 Ming, Emma Forge Fencing Teams DUR E24 1693 1331.34
18 Fleeger, Sophia Miracle Fencing Club D24 1479 1176.24
19 Barboriak, Emily Nova Fencing Club U 1486 1020.90
20 Wilfret, Katerina Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1335 1006.02
21 Fang, Darcy Miracle Fencing Club D25 1387 921.30
22 Fang, Elena Miracle Fencing Club U 1109 524.08
23 Alshaarawi, Sofia Oregon Fencing Alliance U 1117 443.78
24 Lozier, Camryn Triple Threat Fencing Academy U 882 252.19
25 Vannier, Anouk Capital Fencing Academy U 956 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!