Midwest ROC/RJCC

Veteran Men’s Epee (VETME)

Sunday, September 8, 2024 at 3:00 PM

Register

Canlan Sports Lake Barrington - Barrington, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2975 3349 - 2764
5 - 8 2520 2818 - 2251
9 - 16 2226 2516 - 1981
17 - 25 1673 2003 - 993

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Stone, Brian Two Ravens Fencing School B22 3349 2690.82
2 Glass, Timothy Ataba Fencing Club B24 2934 2645.86
3 Karolak, Dale Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy A22 2852 2562.11
4 Geraci, Paul Indianapolis Fencing Club B23 2764 2439.16
5 Wheeler, Mark Windy City Fencing-Chicago B22 2619 2318.42
6 Ferko, Philip The Fencers Academy C23 2818 2252.88
7 Evert, Todd Royal Arts Fencing Academy C24 2391 2050.20
8 Swanson, Dave Ataba Fencing Club B21 2251 1974.40
9 Conn, Brian Cincinnati Fencing Club C23 2516 1913.75
10 Rodachy, Jeffrey Two Ravens Fencing School B22 2182 1831.45
11 Kline, R. Jay Two Ravens Fencing School B23 2060 1725.45
12 Elterman, Lev Windy City Fencing-Chicago C24 2035 1679.19
13 Fu, Andrew The Fencers Academy D24 2421 1658.14
14 Menne, Chris Buccaneer Blades Fencing D23 2153 1564.76
15 Treanor, Donald Fencing Center Of Chicago U 1981 1446.67
16 Walton, Forest Escrime Du Lac C22 2457 1338.60
17 McNally, Thomas Culver Military Academy D21 2003 1299.94
18 Varney, Douglas Illinois Fencing Academy E24 1967 1299.48
19 Cancelo, Jose Windy City Fencing-Chicago D24 1901 1244.73
20 Tierney, Luke Iowa City Fencing Center C23 1620 1229.42
21 Franger, Jeff Escrime Du Lac E24 1972 1222.51
22 St. George, David Ataba Fencing Club E21 1580 1030.51
23 Jorgensen, Jay Sioux City Fencing Club E21 1459 396.11
24 Plummer, Ken Indianapolis Fencing Club U 993 327.38
25 Chen, Vincent Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1561 261.83

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!