Midwest ROC/RJCC

Veteran Men’s Epee (VETME)

Sunday, September 8, 2024 at 3:00 PM

Register

Canlan Sports Lake Barrington - Barrington, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3032 3424 - 2718
5 - 8 2617 2862 - 2269
9 - 16 2231 2457 - 1959
17 - 25 1747 2295 - 1098

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Glass, Timothy Ataba Fencing Club B24 3064 2753.58
2 Stone, Brian Two Ravens Fencing School B22 3424 2724.94
3 Karolak, Dale Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy A22 2921 2607.55
4 Wheeler, Mark Windy City Fencing-Chicago B22 2718 2387.46
5 Geraci, Paul Indianapolis Fencing Club B23 2671 2308.05
6 Ferko, Philip The Fencers Academy C23 2862 2153.59
7 Conn, Brian Cincinnati Fencing Club C23 2666 2009.92
8 Swanson, Dave Ataba Fencing Club B21 2269 1976.87
9 Evert, Todd Royal Arts Fencing Academy C24 2362 1876.32
10 Rodachy, Jeffrey Two Ravens Fencing School B22 2200 1784.10
11 Kline, R. Jay Two Ravens Fencing School B23 2131 1758.25
12 Menne, Chris Buccaneer Blades Fencing D23 2162 1549.11
13 Elterman, Lev Windy City Fencing-Chicago C24 1959 1541.49
14 McNally, Thomas Culver Military Academy D21 2295 1453.83
15 Fu, Andrew The Fencers Academy D24 2285 1444.47
16 Walton, Forest Escrime Du Lac C22 2457 1338.60
17 Cancelo, Jose Windy City Fencing-Chicago D24 2128 1324.41
18 Tierney, Luke Iowa City Fencing Center C23 1721 1279.95
19 Franger, Jeff Escrime Du Lac E24 2295 1247.10
20 Treanor, Donald Fencing Center Of Chicago U 1858 1227.90
21 Varney, Douglas Illinois Fencing Academy E24 1956 1039.91
22 St. George, David Ataba Fencing Club E21 1485 811.97
23 Jorgensen, Jay Sioux City Fencing Club E21 1459 396.11
24 Plummer, Ken Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1098 258.45
25 Chen, Vincent Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1722 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!