Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 45% |
2 | NGUYEN Tallulah | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% | |
3 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
3 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
5 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
6 | RAZA Nadia A. | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | |
7 | KOKES Ava | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
8 | LEACH Meka A. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
9 | SWENSON Nikita G. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
10 | MALLAVARPU saanvi | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
11 | RUMMEL Katherine E. | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
12 | GLICK Nina | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
13 | LI Suri | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
14 | SKOURLETOS Angelina | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
15 | FURMAN Maria | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | - |
16 | COLLIER Ava | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
17 | HAYNES Antonia | 8% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
18 | LO Sabrina S. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
18 | BARBARA Camille | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
20 | HSU Adele Y. | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
21 | ELSTON Sophia | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
22 | BOHRER Shira | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
23 | BECKMAN Ana | 31% | 41% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
24 | YE Selina | 20% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
25 | NELSON Grace E. | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
26 | MACEY Hadley | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
27 | SACHAR Ruhi | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.