The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZUBATIY Samuel | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 14% |
2 | XU William | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
3 | FALLICK Ozzie | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
3 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
5 | BEITEL Noah | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
6 | STONE Esmond A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
7 | CHEN Howard | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% |
8 | LEITH Jack | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
9 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
10 | BAUER Hank E. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
11 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
12 | KANG Evan | 7% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
13 | YANG Dylan | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
14 | JAIN Aniket | 4% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
15 | JEFFRY Nicholas B. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
16 | SUORSA Markus | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% |
17 | CAISSE Simon B. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
18 | LAM Ethan | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
19 | KIM Ryan | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
20 | YANG Joshua | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
21 | JEFFRY Christian B. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
22 | LI Li | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
23 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 4% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
24 | GAO Marcus | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - | - | - |
25 | POFF Kainoa | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
26 | RAMANAN Govind | 8% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
26 | CHUA Jared | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
28 | UYANIK Muhammet | 21% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.