Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KARNAS Karol | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
2 | ROBINSON Matthew | - | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
3 | THOMAS Samuel | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
3 | PRABHAKAR Vibhav | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
5 | HANAHAN Tom M. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 33% | 3% |
6 | MILLER Lance W. | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
7 | KRAJ Pawel | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 3% |
8 | EVERHART Ryan | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 31% | 6% |
9 | BOLARIN Oluwatosin | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% |
10 | GUILFORD Corey | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
11 | SWANSON Dave | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
12 | MENTELE Caden | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
13 | SKOURLETOS Angelina | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
14 | MCNICHOLAS Evan | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% |
15 | LAUER Michael | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
16 | RIPLEY Ian | 1% | 11% | 44% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
17 | REED Allen | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
18 | SOARE Maria Elena | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
19 | FIELDS Elijah | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
20 | DICKSON Tim | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
22 | ORGAN Drew | 28% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
23 | CRAPNELL Daniel | 8% | 32% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
24 | THRASHER Andrew W. | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
25 | MACEY Hadley | 12% | 43% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
26 | ORGAN Jason | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
27 | SWEETS Aidan | 14% | 48% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
28 | JONES Hope | 46% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.