ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
2 | TOLBA Salma | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
3 | MINOR Lindsey | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 20% |
3 | SONG Angela | - | 8% | 31% | 43% | 18% | |
5 | GUJJA Misha | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 33% | 9% |
6 | LI Alisha | - | 5% | 27% | 44% | 24% | |
7 | WITTE Vera | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
8 | MUELLER Emma M. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% |
9 | HILL Phoebe | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
10 | HANIN Katherine | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
11 | KANEVSKY Samantha | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
12 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 23% |
13 | YOU Isabel B. | - | 16% | 42% | 33% | 8% | |
14 | CHANG Ella | 1% | 14% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
15 | JIA Elizabeth | 17% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
16 | SOMOL Emma | 19% | 50% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
17 | SHU Youshan | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
18 | TYTELL Elizabeth | 1% | 28% | 44% | 23% | 4% | |
19 | SHEIN Evita | 14% | 42% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
20 | KIM Lynne | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
21 | GORTI Ramya | 54% | 38% | 7% | - | - | - |
22 | BA-YUNUS Hafsah | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | |
23 | BA-YUNUS Aasiyah | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.