ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Charles | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
| 2 | MAKLIN Edward P. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 3 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 40% |
| 3 | ZENG Noah | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 18% |
| 5 | LEE Justin | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 6 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% | |
| 7 | HUANG Alex F. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
| 8 | LIU Lawrence | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 10 | SHOMAN Noah | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% |
| 10 | CHEN Leo | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 12 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% |
| 13 | CHEONG Heonjae | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 14 | ENGEL Peter | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 15 | DEPEW Spencer | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
| 16 | MORALES Jonathan | - | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% | |
| 17 | MICLAUS Justin | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
| 18 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 41% | 14% |
| 19 | OH Triton | - | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% |
| 20 | BONDARENCO Vlad | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 22 | CHEONG Heonjun | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 23 | YOO Maxwell | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 24 | GONG Jerry | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 25 | PRIMUS Nazir | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 42% | 15% |
| 26 | BERA Enzo | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 27 | FIELDS Matthew S. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 28 | FLOT Tai A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 14% |
| 29 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 30 | CHENG Hong | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | LEONARD Charles | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | BROU Inkosi | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 33 | KUSHKOV Veniamin | - | - | - | 4% | 25% | 46% | 25% |
| 34 | HOPPA Luke H. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 35 | PENG Bryan | - | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 36 | SANDERS Samuel B. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 37 | RIVERA Jeriel | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 38 | KWALWASSER Eric | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
| 39 | BODKIN Jake M. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 40 | MYLEK Peter | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 41 | VOSS Jeffer | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 42 | HUANG Connor | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 43 | KATZ Ryan | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | TENG MATTHEW | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 45 | GOLD Carter | 1% | 12% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 46 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 8% | |
| 47 | KOVACH Jonah F. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 48 | TAUER Sam | 21% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 50 | SHAHZAD Azlan A. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 51 | GILSON Lucas B. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 52 | PERRON Robert | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 53 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 54 | KNUDSEN Matthew S. | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | TORRES CRUZ Kenai Abey | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 56 | ANAND Sahil Z. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 57 | MCCARTHY Devan | 2% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 58 | SHI Jeremy | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 59 | DEKA Tanush | - | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 60 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 61 | BRANDT Jaden | 4% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 62 | KUSHKOV Daniel | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 63 | POSY Daniel | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 64 | FALCON-KORB Mathis | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 65 | FREDRICK Jameer | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 66 | WONG Caleb W. | 3% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 67 | MOULTON Ian | 3% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 68 | SAVOY Luca | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
| 69 | GILPIN Samuel | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 70 | TANG Charles | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 71 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 72 | MARGULIAN Grant | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 73 | DESAUTELS Connor | 8% | 37% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | SUGIURA Samuel | 2% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 75 | DUMOULIN Gabriel | 12% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 76 | ATWOOD Griffin | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 77 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 77 | MARGULIS Jared | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 79 | GINSBERG jordan | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 80 | SIMMONS John M. | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 81 | STERN Tobias | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 82 | LI Yao (Liam) | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 83 | JEHU Cian | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 2% | - |
| 84 | KESSLER Nathan | 7% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 85 | LONKER Zachary | 38% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 86 | LIGH Checed | 6% | 29% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 87 | YEUNG Jerry | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | LIN Philip T. | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 89 | LAUB William | 28% | 41% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | WEIL Asher D. | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 91 | BHATIA Ekam | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 92 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - | - |
| 93 | SANDHU Arjan | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 94 | ORAL Derin | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 94 | RUIZ Tristan | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 96 | MENDOZA Diwa | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 97 | BLEY Gabriel | 81% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.