Midwest RYC/RJCC

Cadet Men’s Foil (CDTMF)

Sunday, February 9, 2025 at 4:00 PM

Register

Canlan Sports Lake Barrington - Barrington, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2144 2481 - 2012
5 - 8 1751 1871 - 1609
9 - 16 1510 1679 - 1225
17 - 23 1216 2500 - 582

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 DeSeranno, Leander Renaissance Fencing Club C24 2481 2218.04
2 LIU, Yinhong RedStar Fencing Club Chicago C24 2034 1763.45
3 Zhou, Justin The Fencers Academy E24 2050 1713.25
4 McMillian, Harrison Heartland Fencing Academy E24 2012 1627.16
5 LaTorre, Leonardo Renaissance Fencing Club E24 1871 1600.80
6 Holliday, Christopher Mansfield-Scott RedStar Fencing Club Chicago D24 1789 1424.27
7 Hong, Derek Fencing Center Of Chicago D24 1734 1371.23
8 Kagan, Noah Eminence Fencing Academy E24 1609 1305.84
9 LINEBERRY, CADEN Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club E24 1603 1283.38
10 Ruby, Asher Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club E24 1650 1268.15
11 Ferguson, Levi Heartland Fencing Academy U 1679 1155.17
12 Herrera, Xavier Bronzeville Fencing Academy E24 1499 1128.81
13 Webster, Liam The Fencers Academy E24 1621 1115.86
14 Zhang, Hanson Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1427 1089.99
15 McConkey, Tristan Heartland Fencing Academy E24 1377 907.40
16 Tagore, Reyansh Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy E24 1225 700.84
17 Young, Jack Iowa City Fencing Center E24 1056 546.96
18 Black, John The Fencers Academy U 1323 532.52
19 Chan, William Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 893 293.79
20 Ravipati, Suryatej Illinois Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0
21 Ng, Gavin Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 582 < 0
22 Xie, Ethan Queen City Fencers Club LLC U 1208 < 0
23 Kopelman, Henry Iowa City Fencing Center U 951 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!