ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Claire | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 40% | 10% | |
| 2 | CAFASSO Natalya | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
| 3 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 32% | |
| 3 | SHU Youshan | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 36% | |
| 5 | SONG Angela | - | - | 3% | 19% | 48% | 30% | |
| 6 | KUMAR Eva | - | 1% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 7 | TYTELL Elizabeth | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 8 | MEYER Rachel | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 9 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 1% | 13% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 10 | SMUK Alexandra S. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 11 | YOU Isabel B. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 47% | 23% | |
| 12 | LU Ainslie G. | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 13 | SU Evelyn | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
| 14 | PROFIS Liora | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 15 | PRESMAN Aerin | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 17% | 2% | |
| 16 | REKEDA Anna | 18% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 18 | DOUGLAS Marketa F. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | CASHMAN Amanda | 1% | 10% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 2% | |
| 20 | MISHIMA Audrey | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 21 | LIU Charlotte | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 22 | CHATIKHINE Anastasia | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | AGAON Evelyn | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 24 | JUN Bomie | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | PAN Angela | 3% | 29% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | MEYER Rebecca | 2% | 22% | 43% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 27 | COSTA Leah | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
| 28 | GONG Wanqiao | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 29 | SMOTRITSKY Liat | 4% | 26% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | NEFF Saya | 9% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | YANG Charlotte | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 32 | BISONO Valentina | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | FANG Kayla | 51% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | JI Catherine | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 35 | FOUX Abigail | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 36 | SUN Zeyu | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | NAZAROVA Sanam | 6% | 35% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | KENNEDY Shea | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.