Midwest RYC/RJCC

Youth 12 Men’s Epee (Y12ME)

Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Canlan Sports Lake Barrington - Barrington, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1825 1958 - 1775
5 - 8 1664 1833 - 1406
9 - 16 1423 1952 - 1134
17 - 25 1614 2500 - 921

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Perry, Noah Escrime Du Lac U 1958 1617.99
2 Hantov, Adrian Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1788 1459.72
3 Mberia, Henry Escrime Du Lac U 1779 1412.84
4 Talandzevicius, Tomas Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1775 1394.64
5 Peters, Keane Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1833 1261.95
6 Kravchenko, Philip Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1406 890.45
7 Dierking, Cameron Peoria Fencing Academy U 1831 782.71
8 Frank, Luke Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1588 770.11
9 Duchnowski, Thiesson Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1313 731.86
10 Nocon, Garrison Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1354 563.89
11 Buono, Antonino Illinois Fencing Academy U 1413 513.82
12 Munoz, Rocco Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1253 507.77
13 Roullard, Atticus Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1378 476.75
14 Sohoni, Vir Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1952 397.85
15 Andrews, Elliott Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1590 304.40
16 Howard, Killian Escrime Du Lac U 1134 288.34
17 Hohman, Elias Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1107 175.90
18 Nicholas, Miles Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1486 173.40
19 Green, Hudson Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1233 131.33
20 Fiedor, Alex Illinois Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0
21 Crossett, Peter Iowa City Fencing Center U 2500 < 0
22 Lui, Jonah Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 2079 < 0
23 Agrawal, Ariv Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1193 < 0
24 Filkov, Timur Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1508 < 0
25 Abezgauz, Ariel Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 921 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!