ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
2 | LIN James G. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% | |
3 | TSAI Max W. | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | |
3 | KNIZHNIK David | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
5 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
6 | SONG Noel | 2% | 13% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
7 | PITERBARG Maxim | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 8% | |
8 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
9 | JIMENEZ Lukas | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 44% | 22% |
10 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 24% |
11 | TAHOUN Mostafa | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% |
12 | LIU Derek | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 6% | |
13 | LEE Jonah | - | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 12% |
14 | YOON DYLAN | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 40% | 7% | |
15 | WONG Jackson | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
16 | MATSAKH Philip | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
17 | MURRAY Maximo | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% | |
18 | GUO Justin | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | |
19 | LI Ayren | - | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
20 | MILLER Jordan | - | 2% | 24% | 47% | 24% | 3% | |
21 | LI Aaron | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 8% |
22 | KAPOOR Aayan | 6% | 31% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | |
23 | RNO Kyler | 7% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | |
24 | ORLOV Dmitriy | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
25 | WANG Brian | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
26 | NICOLL James | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - |
27 | DALBERG Anders | 16% | 35% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
28 | NICOLL William | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% |
29 | FRANK Amir | 13% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
30 | POPE Alexander | 1% | 9% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - |
31 | GLEBA Nico | - | 5% | 37% | 42% | 14% | 1% | |
32 | SHAPIRO Leon | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
33 | LEE Brendan | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
34 | MAGALONG William | 48% | 45% | 7% | - | - | - | |
35 | LIU Ryan | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
36 | UNGERER Roger M. | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
37 | AKYAMAC Bora | 7% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | |
38 | REZA Farazi | 2% | 10% | 26% | 32% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
39 | NICOLSON William | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
40 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
41 | BROOKS Matthew | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
42 | HIGGASON Hugh | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
43 | SZE Benjamin | 45% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
44 | AMEND Jake | 5% | 27% | 43% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
45 | GAO Gary | 38% | 55% | 7% | - | - | - | |
46 | TINE Peter | 5% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.