Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZAGUNIS Mariel L. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 2 | THOMPSON Kamali A. | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 3 | RUSSO Francesca | D D V V V D | V V V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 3 | MICHEL Violet N. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 5 | BURKE Nora S. | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 6 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 7 | CZYZEWSKI Veronica O. | D V V V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 8 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | D D V D V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
| 9 | SHELTON Aleksandra | V V V D V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 10 | JENKINS Ryan J. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 11 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 12 | LINDER Kara E. | V D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 13 | ADYNSKI Gillian I. | D V V V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 14 | KONG Vera | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 15 | MENTZER Katherine | V D V V V D | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 16 | HIRSCH Sydney R. | V D V V D | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 17 | TIMOFEYEV Daniella | V V V V V V | D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 18 | MERZA Celina | V V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
| 19 | LU Vivian Y. | V V D V V V | D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
| 20 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | D V V V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 21 | LITYNSKI Jacqueline Z. | V V V D V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 22 | POSSICK Lola P. | D V V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 23 | THEODORE Maria A. | V V D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 24 | HOFFMAN Ilsa L. | V V D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 25 | KIM Zoe | D V V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 26 | CHEN Erin Y. | V V D D V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 27 | MILLER Sky | V V D V D D | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 28 | LIANG Megan | D V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 29 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | V D D V D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 30 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | D D V D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 31 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | D V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 32 | WHANG Rebecca | V V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 33 | GOUHIN Chloe | V D V D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 34 | JENKINS Morgan J. | D V V D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 35 | PARKER Abigale B. | V D V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 36 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | D V D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 37 | WHITE Amber L. | D V V V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 38 | HARRILL Gillian N. | V D D V D V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 39 | OISHI Megumi | V V D D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 40 | CHERNOMORSKY Maria | D D V V D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 41 | BERMAN Stella | D D V D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 42 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | V V D D D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 43 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | V D V V D D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 44 | LACSON Sarah | D V D V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 45 | HOOGENDOORN Sterre | D D V D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 46 | HE Charlotte | V D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 47 | REDDY Shreya | V D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 48 | SHEALY Maggie | D V D V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 49 | TANG Catherine H. | D D D V D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 50 | YUN Joy | D V D D D V | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 51 | MOYA Keona L. | V V D D D D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 52 | TONG Kunling | D D D D V V | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 | |
| 53 | HUNTER Nina B. | V D D V D D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 | |
| 54 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | D D D V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 | |
| 55 | JOHNSON Edith (Tori) V. | V D D D D | 3.9 | 1 | -2.9 | |
| 56 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | D V D D D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
| 57 | HASSAN Aziza R. | D V D D D D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
| 58 | KIM Catherine | D D D V D D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
| 59 | LEE Alexandra B. | D D D D D V | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 | |
| 60 | WU Erica L. | D D D D D V | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
| 61 | BROWNE Alexis G. | V D D D D D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 | |
| 61 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | D D V D D D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 | |
| 63 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | D D D D D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 | |
| 64 | KOBOZEVA Tamara V. | D D D D D D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 | |
| 64 | ROH Rachel E. | D D D D D D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 | |
| 66 | YURT Leyla | D D D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
| 67 | WANG Caroline Y. | D D D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.