Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BUHAY Rachel T. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
2 | DESAI Maya D. | - | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 21% | |
3 | TURNOF Kayla M. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
3 | KOO Samantha | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | |
5 | JULIEN Michelle | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
6 | RHIE Lena | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 10% | |
7 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
8 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
9 | EDGINGTON Grace | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% | |
10 | ROBINSON Stella | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - | |
11 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
12 | NOBREGA Carolina S. | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 16% | |
12 | DAVIS Jayna M. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
14 | CHEN Chloe Y. | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
15 | PETE Gillian C. | - | 4% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
16 | GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
17 | PATEL Riya | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% | |
18 | GARIBIAN Emma E. | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
19 | ABOUDAHER Janna A. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
20 | DANIELS Erica | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
21 | WHEELER Kira | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
22 | NOVICK Mia J. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
23 | ZHANG Lynn Y. | 4% | 21% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
24 | KIM Sujin | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
25 | PLONKA Kaley V. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
26 | SAKPAL Raghavi | 25% | 41% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
27 | GRAJALES Emily K. | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
28 | KITTLE Lauren | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
29 | ROGERS Pauline E. | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% | |
30 | HAYES Grace Y. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
31 | KSHIRSAGAR Prachi | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
32 | FAN Jiayi | 12% | 43% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
33 | DREYER Nadia S. | 27% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
34 | WALTER Joanne | 28% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
35 | STARR Cynthia (Cindy) H. | 30% | 46% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
36 | PANIGRAHI Sophia | 4% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
37 | LUM Karen | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - | |
38 | GORDON Sharon | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.