Worcester Fencing Club - Worcester, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | BENTLEY Nick | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
2 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 31% |
3 | PELT Ethan T. | 13% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
3 | MCQUIDE Elliot | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
5 | ABANILLA Luke | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
6 | XIAO Bowen | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
7 | ZHENG Harrison | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
8 | SUTARIA Julian | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
9 | EBERMAN Henry | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - |
10 | WILSON Samuel S. | 8% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 3% | |
11 | BILODEAU Leo | 11% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 1% | |
12 | REN Bingye | 5% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 4% | - |
13 | KONG Luculentus X. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
14 | BLAIR Riley P. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 50% | 30% |
15 | ABRUZZESE Owen | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
16 | RIPA Joseph K. | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
17 | DOHONEY Tommy | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
18 | COFFIN Carleton | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
19 | HAZLETT Grady | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
20 | CANEDO James | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - |
21 | MCKEVITT Conner M. | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% | |
22 | MASTRONARDI Joseph M. | 18% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
23 | VO Jonathan | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
24 | KAPLAN Isa G. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
25 | THOMPSON Samuel | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
26 | HARE John R. | 4% | 29% | 39% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
27 | TIBBETTS Justin | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
28 | EUN Michael | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
29 | MICHALAK Karlen | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.