Duel of the East Coast ROC/RJCC/RYC

Division IA Women’s Saber (D1AWS)

Friday, May 2, 2025 at 11:30 AM

Register

Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Oaks, PA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2556 3246 - 2289
5 - 8 2180 2260 - 2112
9 - 16 1976 2099 - 1821
17 - 24 1860 2500 - 1564

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Ghosh, Priyanka Boston Fencing Club B22 3246 2899.61
2 Chavan, Arya Boston Fencing Club B25 2351 2100.18
3 TENG, EMMA Manhattan Fencing Center C24 2337 2074.76
4 Schaible, Sofia Tim Morehouse Fencing Club C25 2289 2038.57
5 Crooks, Riley Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy C24 2260 2006.14
6 Kandadai, Lara Manhattan Fencing Center C24 2209 1926.34
7 Loo, Kaitlyn Manhattan Fencing Center D25 2137 1885.92
8 Zheng, Valentina Lilov Fencing Academy C25 2112 1851.28
9 Li, Alexis Scarsdale Fencing Center A24 2099 1825.57
10 Niu, Jessica Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy C24 2069 1815.95
11 Birnstill, Reese Mission Fencing Center D24 2065 1780.24
12 Presanth, Nandana Sebastiani Fencing Academy C24 1993 1696.32
13 Huang, Pierra Manhattan Fencing Center C25 1912 1637.22
14 Ong, Lauren International Fencing Club D24 1903 1614.89
15 Duta, Lyra Cobra Fencing Club LLC U 1947 1599.75
16 Khost, Maeve Manhattan Fencing Center D24 1821 1565.23
17 Neuman, Ella Zeta Fencing D23 1843 1558.16
18 McSweeney, Kylie Johns Hopkins University NCAA C24 1948 1542.62
19 Shelley, Scarlett Long Island Fencing Center E24 1819 1491.08
20 Bandhu, Saahiti Escrimeur Fencers Club E25 1785 1488.67
21 Butman, Chloe Alexandra Scarsdale Fencing Center E24 1832 1436.69
22 Barnes, Sarah Hills Fencing Institute D24 1590 1286.11
23 Co Say, Meagan Elizabeth Columbia University NCAA U 2500 < 0
24 Spilka, Linda Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Connecticut) U 1564 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!