Duel of the East Coast ROC/RJCC/RYC

Division II Women’s Saber (DV2WS)

Saturday, May 3, 2025 at 11:30 AM

Register

Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Oaks, PA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2376 2732 - 2132
5 - 8 1971 2065 - 1855
9 - 16 1825 1948 - 1671
17 - 24 1531 1785 - 1173

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kohlberger, Noelle Stamford Fencing Center, LLC E24 2732 2279.75
2 TENG, EMMA Manhattan Fencing Center C24 2337 2074.76
3 Schaible, Sofia Tim Morehouse Fencing Club C25 2303 2052.54
4 Zheng, Valentina Lilov Fencing Academy C25 2132 1870.08
5 Birnstill, Reese Mission Fencing Center D24 2065 1780.24
6 Knobel, Sophia Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. C24 2053 1777.23
7 Huang, Pierra Manhattan Fencing Center C25 1912 1637.22
8 Borgueta, Madison Manhattan Fencing Center E25 1855 1603.19
9 Duta, Lyra Cobra Fencing Club LLC U 1947 1599.75
10 Khost, Maeve Manhattan Fencing Center D24 1831 1574.40
11 Neuman, Ella Zeta Fencing D23 1843 1558.16
12 McSweeney, Kylie Johns Hopkins University NCAA C24 1948 1542.62
13 Shelley, Scarlett Long Island Fencing Center E24 1819 1491.08
14 Bandhu, Saahiti Escrimeur Fencers Club E25 1785 1488.67
15 Kim, Audrey Manhattan Fencing Center D25 1754 1479.33
16 Lee, Kaitlin Aura Fencing Academy D25 1671 1415.08
17 Butman, Chloe Alexandra Scarsdale Fencing Center E24 1785 1377.19
18 Desautels, Alexandra Candlewood Fencing Center D24 1597 1294.57
19 Barnes, Sarah Hills Fencing Institute D24 1585 1279.81
20 Leigh, Adalene Olympian Fencing Studio E24 1559 1259.79
21 Harrison, Allie Mission Fencing Center U 1262 866.61
22 Perry, Madelyn Brooklyn Bridge Fencing Club U 1722 367.15
23 Spilka, Linda Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Connecticut) U 1564 < 0
24 Nadina, Ksenia Fencing Academy Of Philadelphia - North U 1173 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!