Windy City Fencing SYC #10 / RCC

Cadet Women’s Saber (CDTWS)

Saturday, September 21, 2024 at 12:00 PM

Register

The Athletico Center - Northbrook, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2558 2819 - 2186
5 - 8 2102 2150 - 2045
9 - 16 1832 2132 - 1618
17 - 25 1369 1555 - 1034

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Tabangay, Heartlyn Midwest Fencing Club A23 2819 2556.16
2 Senoglu, Irmak RedStar Fencing Club Chicago B24 2763 2497.36
3 Pabian, Emilia Midwest Fencing Club B23 2466 2196.49
4 Kim, Satie Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) B24 2186 1920.13
5 Osminkina-Jones, Kai Manhattan Fencing Center D24 2150 1888.74
6 Singer, Ellery Midwest Fencing Club E24 2144 1820.39
7 Niu, Jessica Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy C24 2045 1784.13
8 Muthappan, Sahana Columbus Fencing And Fitness LLC U 2067 1745.16
9 Kim, Saeren Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1951 1676.29
10 Biesiada, Sophia Louisville Fencing Center, Inc. U 2132 1665.71
11 Waller, London Salle Du Lion Fencing Center D24 1939 1524.41
12 Zawada, Milena Midwest Fencing Club E24 1782 1442.90
13 Chang, Annette Cardinal Fencing Club U 1845 1438.61
14 Hild, Anya Boston Fencing Club U 1667 1382.27
15 Aldort, Amanda Midwest Fencing Club E24 1720 1248.85
16 Jachymiak, Emilia Midwest Fencing Club U 1618 1228.62
17 Yoon, Sela Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1555 1152.63
18 Robbins, Adele Halberstadt Fencers' Club U 1369 826.36
19 Bussell, Ava Midwest Fencing Club U 1361 578.35
20 Malvestuto, Prudence Northwest Indiana Fencing Club U 1236 538.03
21 Williamson, Morgan Renaissance Fencing Club U 1034 524.69
22 Frank, Isabella Columbus Fencing And Fitness LLC U 1317 442.41
23 Lee, Elisha Midwest Fencing Club U 1519 396.76
24 Madden, Chloe Lincoln Square Fencing U 1546 328.12
25 Laguna, Genevieve Salle des Lutins U 1387 292.86

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!