Windy City Fencing SYC #10 / RCC

Youth 10 Men’s Epee (Y10ME)

Saturday, September 21, 2024 at 3:00 PM

Register

The Athletico Center - Northbrook, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1858 1892 - 1803
5 - 8 1718 1849 - 1626
9 - 16 1547 1804 - 1306
17 - 24 1507 1836 - 1120

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wong, Kyle Fortune Fencing U 1892 1614.44
2 Park, Ethan Elite Fencing Academy (GA) U 1852 1523.26
3 Fayez, Adam Elite Fencing Academy (GA) U 1883 1489.42
4 Butler, Xavier New York Fencing Academy U 1803 1481.28
5 Talandzevicius, Tomas Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1849 1457.32
6 Cha, Aiden Elite Fencing Academy (GA) U 1708 1366.23
7 Matusow, Brandon Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 1689 1351.39
8 Yi, Alexander Fortune Fencing U 1626 1327.22
9 You, Asher Elite Fencing Academy (GA) U 1741 1202.45
10 Liu, Maximilian Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1804 1023.43
11 Pagliarini, James Escrime Du Lac U 1655 1015.91
12 Hu, Charles Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1473 977.47
13 Chi, Zachary Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 1308 951.97
14 Kurtovic, Kaim Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1754 846.87
15 Duchnowski, Thiesson Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1337 712.68
16 Trivulce, Ethan Epee Miami Fencing Club U 1306 580.50
17 Allam, Yousuf Advance Fencing U 1836 575.49
18 Roullard, Atticus Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1464 506.29
19 Lim, Cayden Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1262 495.76
20 Pagliarini, John Escrime Du Lac U 1618 330.66
21 Barnett, Edward Advance Fencing U 1605 288.87
22 Hilfiger, Marcos Escrime Du Lac U 1120 32.18
23 Bian, Brandon Advance Fencing U 1759 < 0
24 Tekiela, Marvin Advance Fencing U 1390 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!