Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SATHYANATH Kailing | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
2 | KOBOZEVA Tamara V. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
3 | CHERNOMORSKY Alexandra E. | V V D D D D | V V V V D | 4.5 | 2 | -2.5 |
3 | SHOMAN Miriam | V D V V V D | V V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
5 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
6 | TANG Catherine H. | D V V V V D | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
7 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | V D D V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
8 | EDGINGTON Grace | D D V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
9 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | V V V V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
10 | ZINNI Kaylyn M. | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
11 | BUHAY Rachel T. | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
12 | LIN Audrey J. | V D V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
13 | MARSEE Samantha | D V V V D D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
14 | ZUO Xiaofan | V D V D V D | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
15 | PATEL Riya | D V V D D V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
16 | HAYES Grace Y. | V D V V D D | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
17 | PLONKA Kaley V. | V V V V V V | D | 2.6 | 6 | +3.4 |
18 | KOBERSTEIN Maggie | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
19 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | V D V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
20 | YODER Bridget H. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
21 | TURNOF Kayla M. | V V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
22 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | D V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
23 | KOO Samantha | D V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
24 | ATLURI Sara V. | V V V D D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
25 | DESAI Maya D. | D D D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
26 | CHEN Chloe Y. | D D V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
27 | SPORN Melanie | D D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
28 | KITTLE Lauren | V V D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
29 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | D V V D D D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
30 | DAVIS Jayna M. | D D D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
31 | ROBINSON Stella | D D D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
32 | ENDO Miyuki N. | D V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
33 | JULIEN Michelle | V D V V D V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
34 | LAMBERT Jasmine M. | D V V D V V | D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
35 | DEMING Clare L. | V D V V V D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
36 | YURT Leyla | D V V V D V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
37 | WONG ERIKA G. | V V V D D V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
38 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | V V D D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
39 | GLUCK Myriam | D D V V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
40 | RHIE Lena | D V D V V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
41 | ABOUDAHER Janna A. | D V D D V V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
42 | LIM Isabel K. | D V D D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
43 | BERMAN Frauke | D V D V D V | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
44 | PANIGRAHI Sophia | V D D V V D | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
45 | GARIBIAN Emma E. | V D D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
46 | NOBREGA Carolina S. | V V D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
47 | ROGERS Pauline E. | V D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
48 | SHAY-TANNAS Zoe | D V D D D V | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
49 | ZHANG Lynn Y. | V D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
50 | LAPP Laurie E. | V D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
51 | SAKPAL Raghavi | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
52 | WHEELER Kira | D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
53 | VANCE Beth S. | V D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
54 | KIM Sujin | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
55 | DANIELS Erica | D D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
56 | FAN Jiayi | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
57 | KSHIRSAGAR Prachi | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
58 | KIM Nam Heui | D D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
59 | PETE Gillian C. | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
60 | GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. | D D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
61 | WALTER Joanne | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.