Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% |
| 2 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
| 3 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% |
| 3 | YIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 5 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 28% |
| 6 | WANG Ziqi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 7 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
| 8 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 9 | SENYUVA Su | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 10% |
| 10 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 11 | WATTANAKIT Anda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 13% |
| 12 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 33% |
| 13 | BARNOW Sasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 13% |
| 14 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 18% |
| 15 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
| 16 | YOU Emily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 17 | XUAN Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
| 18 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
| 19 | YAO Melinda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% |
| 20 | SHIV Avni | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% |
| 21 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% |
| 22 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 8% |
| 23 | CAFASSO Natalya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% |
| 24 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 25 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
| 26 | PROFIS Liora | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | BALAKRISHNAN Trisha | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | < 1% | - |
| 28 | BECKMAN Ana | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 29 | KUMAR Eva | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 30 | ZHAO Angela | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 31 | SWENSON Nikita G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 32 | GEVA Eliana | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 33 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 34 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
| 35 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 36 | LEE Claire | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 2% |
| 37 | DOUGLAS Marketa F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | PHUKAN Indra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 30% | 3% |
| 39 | DEPOMMIER Isabelle | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 40 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
| 40 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 14% |
| 40 | WANG Jessie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% | - |
| 43 | YOU Isabel B. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 44 | ZHAN Nancy | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | STERR Isabella M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% | 3% |
| 46 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 47 | AZMEH nour | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 3% |
| 47 | NIX Reagan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 49 | KOVALCHUK Erika S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 50 | LEE REGINA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
| 51 | LI Yuhe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 51 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 18% |
| 53 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 54 | CARRIER Meredith | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
| 55 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 56 | YILMAZ Pinar | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 57 | WANG Victoria | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 58 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 59 | SMOTRITSKY Liat | 100% | 97% | 72% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 59 | GUO Luxi | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | - |
| 61 | MISHIMA Audrey | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 62 | QIU Emily | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 63 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | 1% |
| 64 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 65 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 66 | LISCUM Vivian | 100% | 94% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 67 | SU Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 68 | REKEDA Anna | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 69 | MONOVA Lilyana | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 70 | MIRZA Annoshae | 100% | 91% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 71 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 72 | HOAGLAND Sally | 100% | 78% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | MCKENNA Analise | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 74 | VARAN Kateryna | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 75 | SYKES Elynor | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 76 | HAYNES Antonia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | 2% |
| 77 | YOUNG VIVIAN | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | 17% | 2% |
| 78 | SUN Hanya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 79 | CUEVA Viola | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 80 | MCQUEEN Morgan | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 80 | KOMAROW Anastasia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 82 | LIN Ariel | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 83 | WANG Ziqiao | 100% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 84 | SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle | 100% | 98% | 78% | 28% | 4% | - | - |
| 85 | WRIGHT Madison | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 86 | SCHOR Elisabeth | 100% | 94% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 87 | WANG Sara | 100% | 96% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 88 | KUMAR Anusha | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 89 | HOY Emmarose | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 90 | PETROFF Gabrielle | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 90 | NOH Rachel | 100% | 72% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 92 | SUN Zeyu | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 93 | MOLLINIER Anais | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 94 | BI Michelle | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 95 | JI Catherine | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 96 | CHANG Abigail | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 97 | CHUANG Ramona | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 97 | BO GENESIS | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 99 | WANG Sijia | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 100 | IYER Ishana | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 101 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 101 | FANG Jocelyn | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 103 | SCHMITT Harper | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 104 | TOSH Audrey | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 105 | MARTINEZ Christina | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 106 | DAGLI Saira Veronica | 100% | 56% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 107 | LY Hannah | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 108 | LOZIER Grace | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 109 | GUAN Isabella | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 110 | KIM Kailyn | 100% | 98% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 111 | KANASKAR Ila | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 112 | YERIAN Ayda | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 112 | MEZACK Nicole | 100% | 98% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 114 | ELTERMAN Kate | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 115 | BEATIE Isabella M. | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 115 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 79% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 117 | ZAIDI Maira | 100% | 75% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 118 | FORDER Isabel | 100% | 81% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 119 | FANG jenna kim | 100% | 89% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.