Motor City RYC/RJCC and Y8 Foil

Youth 14 Men’s Epee (Y14ME)

Sunday, September 29, 2024 at 1:00 PM

Register

Elite Sportsplex - Waterford, MI

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2020 2041 - 1982
5 - 8 1844 1925 - 1720
9 - 16 1804 2121 - 1643
17 - 30 1366 1927 - 989

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Liu, Zicheng Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. E24 2038 1751.79
2 Puthoff, Henry Toronto Fencing Club U 2017 1660.48
3 Townshend, Connor Toronto Fencing Club U 2041 1596.67
4 Tu, Jinqi E24 1982 1592.41
5 MA, YIXING (Tiger) D24 1925 1501.19
6 Zhou, Zhi Matthew U 1848 1500.57
7 Herdman, Julian Cleveland Fencing Academy East LLC D24 1720 1407.82
8 Dang, William U 1883 1398.63
9 Fong, Kobe U 2064 1395.99
10 Bagdonas, Olivier Windy City Fencing-Chicago E24 1748 1376.42
11 LIN, ZIJIE U 1734 1354.07
12 Camp, William Hooked On Fencing U 1784 1351.34
13 Solomon, Aryeh Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1681 1351.04
14 Ippolito-John, Matteo Toronto Fencing Club U 2121 1282.70
15 wang, Eason U 1656 1022.25
16 Streeter, Oliver Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1643 989.85
17 Painter, Landon Peoria Fencing Academy E24 1927 983.39
18 Ma, Joseph U 1491 974.38
19 Saylor, Henry Traverse City Fencing Club U 1617 785.12
20 Slavin, Tamir Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1242 761.67
21 Groves, Isaac Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1374 616.09
22 Liu-Xue, Shuliang U 1591 594.85
23 Lee, Wilson Center for Blade Arts U 1391 562.85
24 Sharma, Sahaj Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1075 488.10
25 Jerdee, Colton Traverse City Fencing Club U 1219 486.73
26 Martisek, Martin U 1635 472.43
27 Yang, Junhu Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1008 258.92
28 Chabie, Connor Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1557 < 0
29 Tong, Anson Tin Hang Toronto Fencing Club U 1002 < 0
30 Kanner, Cedric Traverse City Fencing Club U 989 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!