Motor City RYC/RJCC and Y8 Foil

Youth 14 Men’s Epee (Y14ME)

Sunday, September 29, 2024 at 1:00 PM

Register

Elite Sportsplex - Waterford, MI

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2135 2260 - 2046
5 - 8 1936 1982 - 1858
9 - 16 1800 1874 - 1654
17 - 30 1331 1832 - 905

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Liu, Zicheng Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. E24 2046 1762.96
2 Townshend, Connor Toronto Fencing Club U 2099 1697.70
3 Ippolito-John, Matteo Toronto Fencing Club U 2260 1693.88
4 Fong, Kobe U 2135 1665.95
5 Puthoff, Henry Toronto Fencing Club U 1970 1644.23
6 Tu, Jinqi E24 1982 1592.41
7 MA, YIXING (Tiger) D24 1933 1575.60
8 Bagdonas, Olivier Windy City Fencing-Chicago E24 1858 1541.72
9 Zhou, Zhi Matthew U 1855 1524.94
10 Camp, William Hooked On Fencing U 1874 1485.58
11 Dang, William U 1864 1473.28
12 Herdman, Julian Cleveland Fencing Academy East LLC D24 1736 1447.33
13 Solomon, Aryeh Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1737 1431.59
14 Streeter, Oliver Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1850 1382.75
15 LIN, ZIJIE U 1654 1296.90
16 Painter, Landon Peoria Fencing Academy E24 1832 1154.78
17 Ma, Joseph U 1516 1092.12
18 wang, Eason U 1558 999.82
19 Martisek, Martin U 1832 953.67
20 Saylor, Henry Traverse City Fencing Club U 1527 912.02
21 Lee, Wilson Center for Blade Arts U 1415 862.06
22 Jerdee, Colton Traverse City Fencing Club U 1342 763.60
23 Slavin, Tamir Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1187 742.08
24 Yang, Junhu Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1232 705.33
25 Groves, Isaac Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1374 616.09
26 Liu-Xue, Shuliang U 1591 594.85
27 Sharma, Sahaj Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1036 464.85
28 Chabie, Connor Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1127 < 0
29 Tong, Anson Tin Hang Toronto Fencing Club U 905 < 0
30 Kanner, Cedric Traverse City Fencing Club U 989 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!