Motor City RYC/RJCC and Y8 Foil

Youth 14 Men’s Epee (Y14ME)

Sunday, September 29, 2024 at 1:00 PM

Register

Elite Sportsplex - Waterford, MI

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1991 2106 - 1936
5 - 8 1835 2121 - 1653
9 - 16 1686 2147 - 1327
17 - 30 1791 2500 - 1101

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Puthoff, Henry Toronto Fencing Club U 2106 1721.10
2 Liu, Zicheng Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. E24 1982 1664.64
3 MA, YIXING (Tiger) D24 1936 1468.32
4 Tu, Jinqi E24 1939 1445.18
5 Zhou, Zhi Matthew U 1834 1428.60
6 Herdman, Julian Cleveland Fencing Academy East LLC E24 1733 1374.21
7 Solomon, Aryeh Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1653 1290.52
8 Ippolito-John, Matteo Toronto Fencing Club U 2121 1282.70
9 LIN, ZIJIE U 1713 1273.21
10 Townshend, Connor Toronto Fencing Club U 1810 1198.80
11 Bagdonas, Olivier Windy City Fencing-Chicago E24 1633 1185.64
12 Ma, Joseph U 1621 1000.57
13 wang, Eason U 2147 917.48
14 Dang, William U 1618 912.92
15 Camp, William Hooked On Fencing U 1616 860.59
16 Slavin, Tamir Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1327 787.33
17 Fong, Kobe U 2205 745.15
18 Painter, Landon Peoria Fencing Academy E24 2180 736.61
19 Groves, Isaac Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1429 630.27
20 Sharma, Sahaj Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1299 591.22
21 Lee, Wilson Center for Blade Arts U 1602 234.46
22 Yang, Junhu Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1535 224.26
23 Jerdee, Colton Traverse City Fencing Club U 1101 133.18
24 Streeter, Oliver Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1204 8.27
25 Martisek, Martin U 2500 < 0
26 Liu-Xue, Shuliang U 2500 < 0
27 Chabie, Connor Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0
28 Saylor, Henry Traverse City Fencing Club U 2500 < 0
29 Kanner, Cedric Traverse City Fencing Club U 1326 < 0
30 Tong, Anson Tin Hang Toronto Fencing Club U 1199 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!