Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LAWSON Marie A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
2 | CANO-DIOSA Rosa M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
3 | ASHER Valerie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
3 | SCHMID Carola K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 24% | |
5 | POLANICHKA Nicole P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
6 | MILLIGAN Lauren M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 10% |
7 | EXUM Monica M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% | |
8 | WOLF Lisa A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
9 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 6% |
10 | GANSER Yuliya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 13% | |
11 | KOCAB Elizabeth (Liz) R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
12 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
13 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
14 | TADLOCK Christine M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
15 | BRISK Angelica A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
16 | GIFFORD Sally | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
17 | HUZEL Lisa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
18 | MONTOYA Amy C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% |
19 | MORET Brighid E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
20 | CAREY Michele S. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
21 | BLOOMER Suzanne | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 5% |
22 | GORDET Cristina G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 51% | 12% |
23 | SANCHEZ-EMDEN Marta | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
24 | HOFMAN Haejung | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
25 | CHOY Ida | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
26 | AHER Bonnie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
27 | WOUNDY Melissa A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
28 | SAFKO Liubov V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% | |
29 | RUNYON Cynthia J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
29 | FINNEGAN Ellen M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
31 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 2% | |
32 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
33 | WUNDERLICH Cara J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
34 | ROWLAND May | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
35 | LOVE Georgina | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
36 | COMES Rita | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | |
37 | FRANZ Lisa L. | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
38 | SIMON Sally R. | 100% | 96% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
39 | GROENING Joanne | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
40 | FREY Alison | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
41 | SWENSON Alexandra | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
42 | CUTLER Karen | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
43 | REAM Jann L. | 100% | 83% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
44 | RICH Caroline B. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
45 | KELLEY Cathy A. | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
46 | JENSEN MJ | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
47 | WILKENS Patricia A. | 100% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
48 | KELLY Diane A. | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
49 | WIESSLER-HUGHES Linda | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
49 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 100% | 87% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
49 | BELAOUSSOFF Vera | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
52 | MAUL Judy L. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
53 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
54 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | 100% | 90% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
55 | PIERCE Marcia M. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - |
56 | OSTERBAUER Nancy K. | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
57 | JULIEN Erica | 100% | 89% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
58 | THOMAS Catherine A. | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
59 | WALTER Joanne | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
60 | GROCE Linda J. | 100% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.