Richmond, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LEE Gloria | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 2 | NEELAM Navya | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | QI Julieanne | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | XU Serena | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 5 | KROPP Anne | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 6 | TAM Connie | V V V D V D | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 7 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | D V V V D D | V V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 8 | TALANDZEVICIUS Sophia | V V D D V D | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 9 | FRANGER Macy | V D V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 10 | TISMENSKY Abigail | D V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 11 | PETROFF Eva | V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 12 | WANG Cecilia | V V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 13 | BOROTKO Katerina | V V D D V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 14 | KUPPUSAMY Mahaa | D V V D D V | V V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 15 | ABUELFUTUH Sama | D V D D D V | V V D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
| 16 | SAAKIANTS Ilana | D V D V D D | V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 17 | HANKINS Morgan | V V V V V V | D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 18 | PEI Claire | V V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
| 19 | XU Jessica | D V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 20 | TISMENSKY Avital | V V D V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 21 | ZHONG Isabell | V V D V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 22 | WORKNEH Lulit | V D D V V V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 23 | WU Jessica | D D V V V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 24 | CHEN Alina | V D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | TISHKOVA-ROBERTS Daria | V D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 26 | HALE Reagan | D V V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 27 | HARMON Nikkole | D D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 28 | DESAI Ela | V D D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 29 | ZHANG Jane | V D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 30 | LUO Helen | D V D D D D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 31 | OLUYOLE Isabella | D D D V D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 32 | CARCELLER Bernardita | D D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 33 | BURKS Madison | V D V D V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 34 | LEE Kate | D V V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 35 | OLSON Olivia | D V V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 36 | STEMPKOVSKA Dina | D D V D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 37 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | D D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 38 | MOKRETSOV Leah | D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 39 | WU Michelle | D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 40 | CHANG Allison | D D D D D V | D | 4.4 | 1 | -3.4 |
| 41 | VOSKOV oliva | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 42 | GRIGORYAN Amaliya | V D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 43 | DENEALE Lucia | D V D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 44 | YAO Chloe | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 45 | DAI Chenxi | D D D D D | D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 |
| 46 | MISHIMA Olivia | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.