Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | O'LOUGHLIN Chris S. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
2 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
3 | MECHKOV Iliya | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
3 | LANG Markus | V V D V D | V V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
5 | AMELI Sean | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
6 | REES Daniel I. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
7 | FRANK Fred | V V V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
8 | ROOD Alex | V V D V D | V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
9 | HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. | V D V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
10 | POULIQUEN Benoit (Ben) | D V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
11 | LOEFFLER Carl E. | V V V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
12 | WALLACE Patric | V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
13 | JOHNSON Jeff | V D V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
14 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | D D V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
15 | NIXON Mark | D D V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
16 | PERKA Michael | V D V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
17 | WATRALL Rick | V V D V V V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
18 | SUMLER Jeffery | V D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
19 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
20 | NGUYEN Cuong T. | V V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
21 | DESAMOURS Georges H. | V V D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
22 | SUVEG Bela | D V V D V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
23 | BECK Brian C. | V V V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
24 | POPPRE Michael N. | V V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
25 | HAYENGA Gary M. | D D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
26 | GUMAGAY Paul | V D V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
27 | HITCHCOCK David | D D D V V | V D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
28 | SKOPIK Jr August | D D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
29 | BALESTRACCI Chris | D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
30 | TRIFILETTI Lawrence T. | D V V D D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
31 | DAVIS Andrew | V D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
32 | KRUGER Mark (Mark Kruger) | D V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
33 | GREENE II Charles E. | V V V D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
34 | SWANSON Dave | V D V V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
35 | BARAFF David | V V D D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
35 | PARTE Aidan | V D V V D | D | 0.5 | 3 | +2.5 |
37 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | V V D D V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
38 | FELDMAN Adam | V D D V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
39 | JENSEN David | D D V V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
40 | POPOVICI Alexander M. | V D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
41 | LEE Stephen K. | D D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
42 | STEWART Robert | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
43 | SPENCER Richard (Spenc) E. | D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
44 | SCHULTZ Douglas B. | D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
45 | CLINEFELTER Dennis S. | D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
46 | ESVAL Kevin | D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
47 | KUHN Jeffrey | D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
48 | KAUFMAN Joel H. | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
49 | BEITTEL David F. | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
50 | RIFKIND Neil | D D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
51 | KAIN Brad | D D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
52 | OCHS Bradley C. | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
53 | WILLIAMS Richard | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
54 | ABELE Chris | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
55 | NEMAZIE David A. | D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
55 | LIPTON Michael D. | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
57 | ROGERS John D. | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.