Bellevile High School Gymnasium - Belleville, MI, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ARLINGTON Nicholas J. | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 2 | SILVERS Ari | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | POON Alvin | V V D V D V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 3 | PRABHAKAR Vibhav | V V D V D | V V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 5 | HAW Keith F. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 6 | BROOKS Zachary B. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 7 | ELYADERANI Paxon | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 8 | SONN Rohan | V V D V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 9 | MICKO Fritz K. | V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 10 | MCKEEVER Luca | V V V D V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | HEIM Bryce | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 12 | GOHSMAN Maxwell | V D V V V | V V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 13 | WILKINSON Derek H. | V V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 14 | ELTERMAN Lev | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 15 | SWANSON Dave | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 16 | DITTEL Aaron K. | V D V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 17 | OCHS Bradley C. | V D V V V V | V D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
| 18 | BECKER Thomas | D V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 19 | NORCONK Claire R. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 20 | RIVERA Ricky N. | V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 21 | JANYSKA Allen | V V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 22 | ASGARALLY Anthony | V V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 23 | KLINE R. Jay | D V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 24 | VELINOV Gabriel | V V D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 25 | DALTON Matthew | D D V V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 26 | OWENS Andrew J. | V D D V V D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 27 | KWOK Roland | D V V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 28 | MITTAL Sanil | V D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 29 | BROWN Amanda | D V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 30 | VUKELICH Daniel | V V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 31 | DEPAUW Devan | V D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 32 | HADD Jonathon | V D D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 33 | WIDMANN Ceili | V V V D V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 34 | ECKEL Anson J. | V V D V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 35 | SKOURLETOS Angelina | D D V V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 36 | BERTRAND Matthew T. | V D D V V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 37 | JONES Reilly | D V V V D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 38 | CACCAMO Nicholas | V V D D D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 39 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | D D D V V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 40 | KIM Sebastian | D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 41 | GREEN Scott D. | V D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 42 | LI Qiuye | D V V D D D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 43 | HOORNSTRA David S. | D V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 44 | KOKA Ashwin | D D D D V V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 45 | MURRAY John P. | D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 46 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | D D V D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 47 | MITKUS Marianne J. | D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 48 | GREEN Zachary J. | D D D D V D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 49 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 50 | FAGERHAUG Aubrey R. | D D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 51 | MCGRATH Polina S. | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 52 | GERTISER Amalie (Amy) C. | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 53 | LIEBER Adam | D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 54 | LAPP Laurie E. | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 55 | ZEHE Michele A. | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 56 | BAKKE Alexander | D D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
| 57 | ELTERMAN Kate | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 58 | TURZILLO Mary A. | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.