Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% | |
| 2 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 16% | |
| 3 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 3 | WANG Zhuoyi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
| 5 | JOO Jeein | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 6 | CHOW William T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% |
| 7 | RHEE Ethan N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 8 | GAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 21% | |
| 9 | TAO Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 10 | KROON Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 24% |
| 11 | BYON Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% |
| 12 | TENG MATTHEW | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 31% | |
| 13 | COOK Cole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
| 14 | PATRICO Peter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 15 | DUDNICK Christian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 3% |
| 16 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 17 | LIM William J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 18 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 36% |
| 19 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 20 | JAIN Aniket | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 21 | ZHAO Zhiyu | 100% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | < 1% | - |
| 22 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 23 | BARRIOS Diego | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | ZHANG Yupeng | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% | 1% |
| 25 | LI Yiwei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 26 | YAN Kevin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | BYON Julian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 2% |
| 28 | KLEIMAN Jakob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 17% | |
| 28 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 30 | NGO Maximus | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | LESUEUR Luke J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 32 | NIETO Titus P. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
| 33 | CHEN Lohen | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
| 34 | GAO Marcus | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | FENG Weiting (ryan) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 36 | OLARIO Raphael | 100% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | RICHARDS Corey | 100% | 84% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | KIM Evan | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | KUMAR Sachit | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 24% | |
| 40 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 100% | 93% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | CHEN Zejia E. | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 42 | VELTZ Tyler J. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 43 | CHAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 43 | LI linze | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | KANG Evan | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 46 | ZENG Vito | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | BRAKEY Ryan | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | YU Kevin | 100% | 82% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | TOLEDO Carlos | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 50 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | GUO Brian | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | WANG HongXi | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 53 | CETTO Luca | 100% | 98% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | YU Casey | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | HERRERA aragon | 100% | 73% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 56 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | - | - | |
| 57 | HARTE William | 100% | 63% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | NGUYEN Max | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 59 | KIM Hosan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 60 | SEELMAN Cole | 100% | 92% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.