Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 2 | TSE Angelina | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 3 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 3 | SCHMIDT Isabel | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 5 | MANN Sophia J. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 9% |
| 6 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 7 | LO Chloe | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 8 | YAM Danika | - | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
| 9 | YU Zhiang | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 13% |
| 10 | ZOLLER Noelle | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 11 | CHAN Jolene | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 5% |
| 12 | WANG Jingming | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 13 | TAN Adelyn | - | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | FENG Alicia G. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 15 | LI Sonia | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 16 | CHEN Elaine | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | BUCKHOUSE Talia | - | 6% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 18 | HUYANG xinke | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 19 | LOMOTAN Addison | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 20 | TENG EMMA | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 21 | NAVARRO LARIOS KATE | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 22 | MUNGUIA Mila | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 23 | WANG Jiayi | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 24 | LIN Annika | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 25 | LIU Hannah | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 27% | 3% |
| 26 | LEE Irene | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | CHEN Colette | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 28 | BAO Jingxuan | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | LIAO Jieni | - | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 30 | DUDNICK Morgan | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | WANG Peijia | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 32 | ZHAO Abbie | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | CAI Veronica | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 34 | LEE Madeleine | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 35 | JENSEN Katrina | 86% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 36 | HAN Emma | 23% | 51% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 37 | GAN Shelby | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | LIU Emily | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 39 | BAIRD Kaleah | 21% | 40% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | PHAN Genevieve | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | BALUJA Emma | 52% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 42 | LIU kai yin aria | 50% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.