Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PERNICE Robin J. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% |
2 | FOLEY Eileen | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
3 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | - | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
3 | GLUCK Myriam | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
5 | KING Robin E. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
6 | ENOCHS Liz | - | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% |
7 | ALTMAN Leigh | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
8 | WILSON Dawn J. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
9 | JERKINS Jayne A. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
10 | KLEIN-BRADDOCK Kimberly K. | - | - | 4% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% |
11 | VANCE Beth S. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
12 | OBLONSKY Natalia | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
13 | LAPP Laurie E. | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
14 | WILKERSON Mary B. | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - |
15 | KIM Nam Heui | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
16 | DIEGEL Angela E. | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
17 | YANG Jenny J. | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
18 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - | - |
19 | WALTER Joanne | 11% | 54% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
20 | DENNER Jasmina | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% |
21 | KNUTSON Theresa S. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
22 | VILLYARD Cynthia (Cy) A. | 4% | 28% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
23 | IIZUKA Sawako | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
24 | GIULIANO Anne | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
25 | DEGEN Anita L. | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
26 | MAUL Judy L. | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
27 | DUDLEY Gayle | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.