Birmingham Fencing Club - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | XIAO Enoch A. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 99% |
2 | XIAO Ethan J. | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
3 | ROSS III III Paul D. | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 24% | |
3 | ZOU Yuming | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 33% | - |
5 | HEARN Christen J. | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 9% | |
6 | WONG Garrick G. | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
6 | LI Sophia M. | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% | |
8 | NEYMAN Sampson | - | 6% | 28% | 43% | 22% | - |
9 | AMMON Blue | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
10 | WANG Brayden | 10% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
11 | SAMAHA Nicholas | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 4% | |
12 | DING Tommy | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
13 | BRUSH Sydney | 14% | 44% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
14 | YANG Ethan J. | 5% | 28% | 46% | 19% | 2% | - |
15 | RAY Adam | - | 3% | 20% | 48% | 29% | - |
16 | LI Zilin | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | |
17 | SU Daniel | 58% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - |
18 | MITCHELL Henry | 13% | 40% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
19 | MAI Hung | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
20 | PARSONS John | 6% | 38% | 41% | 14% | 1% | |
21 | ZHANG Bryan | 3% | 49% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
22 | LATHAM Avery | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.