Birmingham Fencing Club - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ROSS III III Paul D. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 32% | 43% | 14% |
| 2 | HEARN Christen J. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% |
| 3 | CURTIS William K. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 3 | ZOU Yuming | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | ||
| 5 | RAY Adam | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 4% | |
| 6 | DING Tommy | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 7 | NEYMAN Sampson | - | - | 2% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 7% |
| 8 | SAMAHA Nicholas | - | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 9 | LI Zilin | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 10 | SMITH Andrew | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% | |
| 11 | EVELAND Zoe | 3% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 5% | ||
| 12 | BRUSH Sydney | 11% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 13 | TAN Isabella | 5% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 3% | ||
| 14 | GRAY Martha R. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 15 | COILE Clifford E. | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 16 | MITCHELL Henry | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 17 | YANG Ethan J. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 18 | JEONG Aaron | 10% | 39% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 19 | MAI Hung | 7% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 2% | ||
| 20 | SU Daniel | 12% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | HELSEL Amber | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 22 | ZHANG Bryan | 27% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | ||
| 23 | PARSONS John | 12% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | LATHAM Avery | 26% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 25 | THORNE Joshua | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.