Boston Fencing club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KWALWASSER Eric | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 25% | |
2 | BAE Jason I. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 34% |
3 | BROU Inkosi | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 7% | |
3 | CHTERENTAL Alex | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 21% | |
5 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | - | - | 7% | 34% | 59% | ||
6 | NG Jeremiah | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
7 | LIN Maxim | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
8 | LAU Justin Y. | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
9 | MICLAUS Justin | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
9 | DEPEW Spencer | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
11 | HUROWITZ Max | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
12 | SHAHZAD Azlan A. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
13 | ZENG Noah | - | - | 6% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
14 | LIU Kevin | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
15 | HUANG Connor | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
16 | SUGIURA Samuel | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
17 | GINSBERG Jordan | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
18 | DOWNEY Baran | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
19 | GONG Jerry | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
20 | PERRON Robert | 1% | 12% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | |
21 | ATWOOD Griffin | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
22 | HUANG Alexander C. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
23 | NGUYEN Anthony | 1% | 13% | 41% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
24 | DUMOULIN Gabriel | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
25 | KESSLER Nathan | 3% | 25% | 44% | 24% | 3% | ||
26 | WANG Daniel | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
27 | KANG evan | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
28 | FIELDS Matthew S. | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 6% | |
29 | TAUER Sam | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
30 | LEUNG Ian | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
31 | KUMAR Arjun | 32% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
32 | MATTOO Surya | 28% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
33 | SIMMONS John M. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
34 | KATZ Ryan | 1% | 15% | 41% | 36% | 7% | ||
35 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 7% | 36% | 40% | 15% | 1% | ||
36 | SEN Christian | 8% | 51% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
37 | LAUB William | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
38 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
39 | DIMATTEO Michael | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
40 | ALMEDA Stanislav | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
41 | LEE Andrew | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
42 | CHENG Hong | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
43 | LIN Philip T. | 6% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
44 | WITCZAK Mateus | 13% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
44 | DESAUTELS Connor | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
46 | MATTOO Deven | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | ||
47 | CHIN Nigel | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
48 | KLAUBER Raphael | 78% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.