Boston Fencing club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHTERENTAL Alex | D V V V V | V V V V V | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 2 | MICLAUS Justin | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | BROU Inkosi | V V V D D | V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 5 | FIELDS Matthew S. | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
| 6 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 7 | DOLAN Charles R. | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 8 | LIU Kevin | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 9 | ZHUANG Rayken | V V V D V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 10 | PIWOWAR Alex | V D V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 11 | WANG Daniel | V V V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 12 | HUANG Tom | D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 13 | HAN Daniel Y. | V V D V D D | V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 14 | NG Jeremiah | D V V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 14 | GONG Jerry | V V D D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | ELIN Adam E. | D D D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 17 | BAE Jason I. | V D V V V V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 18 | DEPEW Spencer | V D D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 19 | SUGIURA Samuel | D V D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 20 | EDELMAN Seth A. | V D D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 21 | PERRON Robert | D V D D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 22 | WAXLER Seth B. | V D V D D V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 23 | KESSLER Josh | D V V D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 24 | HUROWITZ Max | V D V D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | SKINNER Graham B. | V V D D D | D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 26 | EYBELMAN Ariel | V D V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 27 | LIN Maxim | D D V V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 28 | LAU Justin Y. | D D D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | LIN Philip T. | V D D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 30 | HUANG Connor | D V V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 31 | GINSBERG Jordan | D V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 32 | DOWNEY Baran | D D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 33 | KAPOOR Tanmay | D V V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 34 | BROOK Joel | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 35 | NGUYEN Anthony | D D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 36 | TAUER Sam | D D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 37 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 38 | LAUB William | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 39 | SABATINI Lucas | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.