The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Jason Liu and (2) Abdel Salem.

Event Preview

Youth 14 Men’s Epee (Y14ME)

GRAFA RYC\RJCC\ROC- Third Coast CupSunday, November 24, 2024 at 12:00 PM

MSA Fieldhouse · Grand Rapids, MI
28 approved entrants 4 strength bands

Strength distribution

Finish Range Average Range
1 - 4 2041 2098 - 1922
5 - 8 1842 1934 - 1799
9 - 16 1713 1800 - 1535
17 - 28 1306 1579 - 879

Registrations

1 Bagdonas, Olivier Windy City Fencing-Chicago E24 2098 1826.61
2 CHEN, Isaac Zhi Unattached E24 2075 1799.19
3 Tu, Jinqi Unattached C24 2070 1731.62
4 Camp, William Hooked On Fencing U 1922 1592.87
5 Peters, Keane Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1934 1591.76
6 Perry, Noah Escrime Du Lac U 1831 1550.21
7 Herdman, Julian Cleveland Fencing Academy East LLC D24 1799 1539.91
8 Hantov, Adrian Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1802 1527.09
9 Hong, Daniel Fencing Center Of Chicago C24 1800 1498.16
10 Larson, Vaughn Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1786 1485.16
11 Goodman, Liam Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1748 1458.98
12 Saylor, Henry Traverse City Fencing Club U 1770 1404.67
13 Streeter, Oliver Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1744 1401.43
14 Jerdee, Colton Traverse City Fencing Club U 1652 1294.78
15 Peng, Ethan Lincoln Fencing Club U 1672 1271.36
16 Lee, Wilson Center for Blade Arts U 1535 1183.73
17 Sadler, Donovan Ataba Fencing Club U 1579 1004.28
18 Clarke, Calix Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1522 905.89
19 Yang, Junhu Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1210 845.69
20 Slavin, Tamir Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1189 813.01
21 Hurley, Michael Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1396 800.16
22 Zanzola, Alexander Advance Fencing U 1372 776.69
23 Ma, James Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1433 611.27
24 Sison, John Saint Louis Fencing Club U 1540 394.32
25 Meiser, Charlie Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 879 < 0
26 Kanner, Cedric Traverse City Fencing Club U 990 < 0
27 Rohlfs, Jude Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1552 < 0
28 Pozywio, Sebastian Escrime Du Lac U 1016 < 0

Rank is based on the conservative estimate, `mu - 3*sigma`, rather than raw strength alone. Newer or less-certain fencers can still appear lower than someone with a similar average but tighter confidence.