GRAFA RYC\RJCC\ROC- Third Coast Cup

Youth 14 Men’s Epee (Y14ME)

Sunday, November 24, 2024 at 12:00 PM

Register

MSA Fieldhouse - Grand Rapids, MI

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1910 1973 - 1794
5 - 8 1754 1866 - 1682
9 - 16 1637 2117 - 1272
17 - 28 1738 2500 - 1052

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Perry, Noah Escrime Du Lac U 1973 1623.39
2 Tu, Jinqi C24 1969 1523.96
3 CHEN, Isaac Zhi E24 1906 1494.78
4 Herdman, Julian Cleveland Fencing Academy East LLC D24 1794 1469.51
5 Hantov, Adrian Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1764 1402.72
6 Larson, Vaughn Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1866 1294.21
7 Bagdonas, Olivier Windy City Fencing-Chicago E24 1682 1284.03
8 Camp, William Hooked On Fencing U 1705 1164.91
9 Peters, Keane Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1875 1131.71
10 Hong, Daniel Fencing Center Of Chicago C24 1573 1130.06
11 Saylor, Henry Traverse City Fencing Club U 2117 1071.49
12 Goodman, Liam Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1603 1008.11
13 Slavin, Tamir Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1272 780.18
14 Clarke, Calix Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1704 731.43
15 Streeter, Oliver Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1545 656.92
16 Sadler, Donovan Ataba Fencing Club U 1406 558.61
17 Jerdee, Colton Traverse City Fencing Club U 1182 396.58
18 Yang, Junhu Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1052 260.90
19 Hurley, Michael Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1231 248.28
20 Lee, Wilson Center for Blade Arts U 1238 178.59
21 Sison, John Saint Louis Fencing Club U 1745 107.03
22 Zanzola, Alexander Advance Fencing U 2500 < 0
23 Rohlfs, Jude Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0
24 Pozywio, Sebastian Escrime Du Lac U 2500 < 0
25 Ma, James Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 2500 < 0
26 Peng, Ethan Lincoln Fencing Club U 1408 < 0
27 Kanner, Cedric Traverse City Fencing Club U 1198 < 0
28 Meiser, Charlie Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1807 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!