The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Jason Liu and (2) Abdel Salem.

Take Action

Event Preview

Youth 12 Men’s Epee (Y12ME)

GRAFA RYC\RJCC\ROC- Third Coast CupSunday, November 24, 2024 at 3:00 PM

Back to tournament Register
MSA Fieldhouse · Grand Rapids, MI
27 approved entrants 4 strength bands

Strength distribution

Finish Range Average Range
1 - 4 1902 1934 - 1831
5 - 8 1782 1951 - 1591
9 - 16 1342 1538 - 1118
17 - 27 1062 1421 - 745

Registrations
1 Kiciman, Leo Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1921 1623.11
2 Camp, William Hooked On Fencing U 1922 1592.87
3 Peters, Keane Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1934 1591.76
4 Perry, Noah Escrime Du Lac U 1831 1550.21
5 Hantov, Adrian Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1802 1527.09
6 Talandzevicius, Tomas Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1786 1507.71
7 Sohoni, Vir Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1951 1467.07
8 Duchnowski, Thiesson Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1591 1284.72
9 Lee, Wilson Center for Blade Arts U 1535 1183.73
10 Nicholas, Miles Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1538 1030.84
11 Zalpuri, Zorin Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1363 990.51
12 Frank, Luke Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1347 911.92
13 Kiciman, Louis Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1268 866.03
14 Nocon, Garrison Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1248 846.62
15 Agrawal, Ariv Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1318 669.72
16 Hohman, Elias Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1118 643.47
17 Leneghan, Declan Cyranos Place U 1108 569.73
18 Roullard, Atticus Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1247 559.12
19 Andrews, Elliott Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1045 534.38
20 Filkov, Timur Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1017 468.26
21 Buono, Antonino Illinois Fencing Academy U 1155 466.28
22 Abezgauz, Ariel Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1031 399.99
23 Dierking, Cameron Peoria Fencing Academy U 965 355.12
24 Howard, Killian Escrime Du Lac U 1072 264.28
25 Meiser, Charlie Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 879 < 0
26 Lytle, Cole Escrime Du Lac U 1421 < 0
27 Lui, Jonah Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 745 < 0

Rank is based on the conservative estimate, `mu - 3*sigma`, rather than raw strength alone. Newer or less-certain fencers can still appear lower than someone with a similar average but tighter confidence.