Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | BOTELHO Lynn A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
| 2 | SEAL Julie T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 47% | |
| 3 | VASHISHT Suparna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 32% |
| 3 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 3% |
| 5 | FEDDE Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% |
| 6 | WALTERS Anne-Marie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% |
| 7 | CHAPMAN Lesley F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% |
| 8 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 33% |
| 9 | DE LA FOSCADE-CONDON Celine | 100% | 100% | 74% | 28% | 4% | < 1% |
| 10 | CAWTHORN Muriel C. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 2% |
| 11 | HUEY Sharone A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 14% | |
| 12 | FERGUSON Diane F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 6% |
| 13 | HENNIG-TRESTMAN Bonnie L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 11% |
| 14 | CHOY Ida | 100% | 86% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | BROWN Rachel (Rachel Brown) F. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 16 | KERR Margaret E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 10% |
| 17 | MALLET Catherine | 100% | 93% | 53% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 18 | LYTLE Darby A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 21% | 2% |
| 19 | TRELOAR Allison F. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 25% | 1% |
| 20 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 21 | STEVENS Joanne B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 6% |
| 22 | MORRISON Monica L. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% | - |
| 23 | WOUNDY Melissa A. | 100% | 78% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
| 24 | ROSENFELD Madelon M. | 100% | 97% | 72% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 25 | CHAYKINA Natalie V. | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 26 | ECKSTEIN Harriet A. | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | WHITT Lynnette A. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 1% |
| 28 | HERMES Kathleen A. | 100% | 98% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | JACKSON Wilma S. | 100% | 100% | 80% | 40% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | SOBISKY Kari | 100% | 62% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | BRUNELLI Alessandra | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 32 | GUNTRUM Pamella (Pam) L. | 100% | 95% | 67% | 20% | 2% | |
| 33 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 34 | HAZEL Susan L. | 100% | 64% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | MORO Diana | 100% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.