Arlington ESports Stadium - Arlington, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SWANSON Alexa | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 51% | |
| 2 | HSU Kaylin | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 3 | CHEN Renee | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
| 3 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
| 5 | DAVIS Logan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 23% |
| 6 | HO Addison | - | - | - | 2% | 26% | 71% | |
| 7 | DUAN Sophie | - | - | 4% | 26% | 56% | 14% | |
| 8 | BROWN Lola | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% | |
| 9 | DENG Melissa | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
| 10 | KUMAMOTO Shino | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 70% | |
| 11 | REN Kayley | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 23% |
| 12 | TANG Melody Fujiao | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 13 | LI Han | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% | |
| 14 | HAN Gian | - | - | 6% | 30% | 47% | 16% | |
| 15 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 16 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
| 17 | PARK Lina | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 32% |
| 18 | WANG Amabel | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 38% | 4% |
| 19 | ZHANG Ivy | - | - | 4% | 29% | 55% | 12% | |
| 20 | PARK Zena | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 21 | CHERNYKH Elina | - | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | WANG DINA C. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% | - |
| 23 | CHAN Mila | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 18% | 2% | |
| 24 | WANG Joanna | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | LI Olivia | 1% | 17% | 41% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | ZHANG Constance | - | 3% | 20% | 52% | 23% | 2% | |
| 27 | WANG CAROL | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 28 | BAE Yooju | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | CHOI JULIE | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 30 | POEI Lauren | 1% | 8% | 37% | 43% | 10% | - | |
| 31 | WANG Selina | 29% | 48% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | CHANG Lydia | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 33 | CHAN Ella | 1% | 14% | 44% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 34 | WU Allison | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | LI Joy | 4% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | SOE Hayleigh | 23% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 37 | ZEE Savannah | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 38 | HUGHES Olivia | 17% | 53% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 39 | KIM Sydney | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 40 | CASHMAN Hailey | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | MCFARLANE Asha | 1% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 42 | LIM Kensie | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 43 | WU Chingfei Amber | 13% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | CHANG Olivia | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | PECK Madeleine | 29% | 49% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 46 | RAJ Indra | 10% | 39% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | ETIKALA Saanvi | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 1% | |
| 48 | LIM Kora | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 49 | GOITIA Genevieve | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | LI Emma Jing | 58% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | DUVVA Sanika | 24% | 46% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 52 | SAIFEE Zahra | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 53 | LAI Miranda | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ZHOU Joi | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | LEE Madeleine | 45% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | WU Emma | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 57 | DERSHEM Abby | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | TUMULA Anima | 1% | 26% | 48% | 23% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.