Arlington ESports Stadium - Arlington, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 2 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | 6% | |
| 3 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
| 3 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% |
| 5 | GUO Luxi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 5% |
| 6 | SYKES Elynor | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
| 7 | QIAN Irene | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 12% | |
| 8 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 9 | BECKMAN Ana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% | |
| 10 | BHATT Anisha | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 11 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 12 | YILMAZ Pinar | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | |
| 13 | LANE Leah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | |
| 14 | LISCUM Vivian | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 15 | STERR Isabella M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% | |
| 16 | LIN Ariel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 1% |
| 17 | YAO Melinda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
| 18 | ZHAO Alina | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 19 | BALAKRISHNAN Trisha | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 20 | WANG Victoria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 25% | 3% |
| 21 | WALLER DEL VALLE Alanis | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 22 | MOLLINIER Angel | 100% | 98% | 73% | 26% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | CHI Chelsea | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 24 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 13% | |
| 25 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 26 | PHUKAN Indra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
| 27 | KANASKAR Ila | 100% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | YOUNG VIVIAN | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 5% | |
| 29 | KUDRYAVTSEVA Margarita | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | 15% | 1% | |
| 30 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 31 | KINDEL Amara | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 32 | XU Celina | 100% | 97% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | IYER Ishana | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 34 | QI Julieanne | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 35 | CHUANG Ramona | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | VAN VACTER Madelynn | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 37 | YERIAN Ayda | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 38 | XU Serena | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 39 | HALE Avery | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | WHITELAW Shyann | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 41 | ELTERMAN Kate | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | KALGAONKAR Arohi | 100% | 95% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | SCHMITT Harper | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 44 | AWALEGAONKAR Saina | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 45 | WU Jessica | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 46 | LI Chelsea | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 47 | JIANG Xinchen | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | WU Michelle | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 49 | ZHAO Yanning | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | BEATIE Isabella M. | 100% | 94% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | MCQUEEN Morgan | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | XU Jessica | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 53 | ANICETO Mahalia | 100% | 97% | 70% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | PARK elli | 100% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | KELLEY Kelleah | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | KELLEY Dessa | 100% | 92% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 57 | RANDOLPH Bethany | 100% | 91% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.