Arlington ESports Stadium - Arlington, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOLZ Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 50% |
| 2 | KUSHKOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | |
| 3 | KALPATHY Rohit | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | |
| 3 | GUFFEY Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 5 | JOO Jeein | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 6 | TAO Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
| 7 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 8 | CHON Collin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 9 | LI Howard | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 10 | ANAND Rohan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% | |
| 11 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 12 | SO Preston | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 13 | WANG Zhuoyi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
| 14 | LI AYDEN | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 15 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 16 | TANI Tino | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
| 17 | LI linze | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 18 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | 6% | |
| 19 | KERCHER Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 20 | PASTORE LIU Vince | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 91% | 66% | 26% |
| 21 | ANAND Rishab | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 22 | TUNG Ryan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 23 | GAY Jono | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 24 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
| 25 | LI Yiwei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
| 26 | CLARK Aram | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 26 | XUE Leo | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 28 | URSU Marcel T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | |
| 29 | PINTO Marcus | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 31 | NG Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
| 32 | KWON Kenneth | 100% | 74% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 33 | MEYERSON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 95% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 34 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 14% |
| 35 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
| 36 | CLARK Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | |
| 37 | KIM ELIJAH | 100% | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 38 | KANG Evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 39 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 95% | 67% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 40 | RONG Jasper | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | VAID Luke | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
| 42 | HUBLALL Ethan | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | CRAIG Andrew | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | LI Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | CORTRIGHT Caedmon | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | ZHANG Kaixuan | 100% | 94% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | WANG Tiger | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 48 | YANG Phillip | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 49 | ZLATINSKI Jason | 100% | 87% | 55% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 50 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 6% | |
| 51 | LIN Lucas | 100% | 68% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 52 | XIAO Brayden | 100% | 97% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | SOKOLOV Arseniy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 10% | |
| 54 | IYER Neil | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 55 | LOO Jason | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 56 | SALMAN Hamzah | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 57 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 58 | ZHOU William | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 59 | ZHAO Zhiyu | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | GUREVICH Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 61 | ZHAO Royce | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 62 | KANG Matthew | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 63 | GONZALEZ Jake | 100% | 92% | 52% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | NAMBIAR Navin | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 65 | WILLIAMS Grayson | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 66 | LEE Brady | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 67 | LIU Yijin | 100% | 84% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 68 | BOLLU Viren | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 69 | VO Maxwell | 100% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 69 | THOMAS Christian | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 71 | ZHU Alexander | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 72 | ZHAO Yifeng | 100% | 93% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 73 | KOTVALI Aneesh | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.